Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Jul;132(1):235-242.
doi: 10.1002/jso.70014. Epub 2025 Jun 13.

Cancer-Specific Survival of Trimodal Therapy Versus Radical Cystectomy in T2N0M0 Non-Urothelial Bladder Cancer

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Cancer-Specific Survival of Trimodal Therapy Versus Radical Cystectomy in T2N0M0 Non-Urothelial Bladder Cancer

Mattia Longoni et al. J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: We hypothesized that, within organ-confined (OC, T2N0M0) non-urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder (non-UCUB) patients, trimodal therapy (TMT) use does not differ from radical cystectomy (RC) regarding cancer control outcomes.

Methods: Within the SEER database (2004-2021), rates of TMT versus RC use in OC non-UCUB patients were calculated. Nearest-neighbor 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and histological subtype was applied. Cumulative incidence plots depicted 5-year cancer-specific (CSM) and other-cause mortality (OCM) rates. Multivariable competing risks regression (CRR) models were fitted. Sensitivity analyses were performed within squamous cell (SCC), neuroendocrine (NEC), and adenocarcinoma (ADK) and other histological subtypes.

Results: Of 814 OC non-UCUB patients, 310 (38%) received TMT versus 504 (62%) RC. After PSM, 5-year CSM rate was 50% after TMT versus 29% after RC and TMT was associated with 2.1-fold higher CSM relative to RC (multivariable HR [mHR]: 2.1, p < 0.001). In sensitivity analyses within 229 (28%) SCC, TMT patients had higher 5-year CSM rates relative to their RC-counterparts (67% vs. 22%, mHR: 4.3, p < 0.001). Similarly, within 314 (39%) NEC, TMT patients had higher 5-year CSM rates relative to their RC-counterparts (mHR: 1.8, p < 0.001). Conversely, within 118 (28%) ADK and 153 (19%) other subtypes, CSM after TMT did not differ from CSM after RC (33% vs. 15%, mHR: 1.4 and 43% vs. 33%, mHR: 1.4; p = 0.4).

Conclusion: In OC non-UCUB patients TMT is associated with significantly higher CSM than RC. Most pronounced survival disadvantage was recorded within SCC and NEC patients.

Keywords: bladder cancer; non‐urothelial; radical cystectomy; subtypes; trimodal therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Estimated annual percent changes (EAPC) depicting temporal trends in trimodal therapy (TMT) (A) and TMT rates according to specific histological subtypes (B) in 814 patients harbouring organ‐confined (OC) non‐urothelial cancer of urinary bladder (non‐UCUB) patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004–2021).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative incidence curves depicting cancer specific mortality (CSM) in patients harbouring organ‐confined (OC) non‐urothelial cancer of urinary bladder (non‐UCUB) after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) between trimodal therapy (TMT) versus radical cystectomy (RC) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004–2021).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot depicting separate competing risks multivariable regression models predicting cancer specific (CSM) according to treatment in patients harboring organ‐confined (NOC) non‐urothelial cancer of urinary bladder (non‐UCUB) treated with either trimodal therapy (TMT) versus radical cystectomy (RC) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004–2021).

Similar articles

References

    1. Aragon‐Ching J. B. and Pagliaro L. C., “New Developments and Challenges in Rare Genitourinary Tumors: Non‐Urothelial Bladder Cancers and Squamous Cell Cancers of the Penis,” in American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book (American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc, 2017), 330–336, 10.1200/EDBK_175558. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holzbeierlein J., Bixler B. R., Buckley D. I., et al., “Treatment of Non‐Metastatic Muscle‐Invasive Bladder Cancer: AUA/ASCO/SUO Guideline (2017; Amended 2020, 2024),” Journal of Urology 212 (2024): 3–10, 10.1097/JU.0000000000003981. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Powles T., Bellmunt J., Comperat E., et al., “Bladder Cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow‐Up ,” Annals of Oncology 33 (2022): 244–258, 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.11.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alfred Witjes J., Max Bruins H., Carrión A., et al., “European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle‐Invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2023 Guidelines,” European Urology 85 (2024): 17–31, 10.1016/J.EURURO.2023.08.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moschini M., D'Andrea D., Korn S., et al., “Characteristics and Clinical Significance of Histological Variants of Bladder Cancer,” Nature Reviews Urology 14 (2017): 651–668, 10.1038/nrurol.2017.125. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types