User and Provider Experiences With Health Education Chatbots: Qualitative Systematic Review
- PMID: 40513000
- PMCID: PMC12180679
- DOI: 10.2196/60205
User and Provider Experiences With Health Education Chatbots: Qualitative Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: Chatbots, as dialog-based platforms, have the potential to transform health education and behavior-change interventions. Despite the growing use of chatbots, qualitative insights into user and provider experiences remain underexplored, particularly with respect to experiences and perceptions, adoption factors, and the role of theoretical frameworks in design.
Objective: This systematic review of qualitative evidence aims to address three key research questions (RQs): (RQ1) user and provider experiences; (RQ2) facilitators and barriers to adoption; and (RQ3) role of theoretical frameworks.
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect from January 1, 2018, to October 1, 2023, for English- or German-language, peer-reviewed qualitative or mixed methods studies. Studies were included if they examined users' or providers' experiences with chatbots in health education or behavior-change contexts. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts (Cohen κ=0.82). We used the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for quality assessment and conducted a reflexive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's framework.
Results: Among the 1754 records identified, 27 studies from 10 countries met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 241 qualitative-only participants and 10,802 mixed method participants (657 contributing qualitative data). For RQ1, users emphasized empathy and emotional connection. For RQ2, accessibility and ease of use emerged as facilitators, whereas trust deficits, technical glitches, and cultural misalignment were key barriers. For RQ3, the integration of behavior-change theories emerged as underutilized despite their potential to increase motivation.
Conclusions: Chatbots demonstrate strong potential for health education and behavior-change interventions but must address privacy and trust issues, embed robust theoretical underpinnings, and overcome adoption barriers to fully realize their impact. Future directions should include evaluations of cultural adaptability and rigorous ethical considerations in chatbot design.
Keywords: behavior change; chatbot; health education; personalization; privacy concerns; qualitative research.; user experience.
© Кyung-Eun (Anna) Choi, Sebastian Fitzek. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org).
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Revolutionizing e-health: the transformative role of AI-powered hybrid chatbots in healthcare solutions.Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 13;13:1530799. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1530799. eCollection 2025. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40017541 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions and Attitudes of Chinese Oncologists Toward Endorsing AI-Driven Chatbots for Health Information Seeking Among Patients with Cancer: Phenomenological Qualitative Study.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 23;27:e71418. doi: 10.2196/71418. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40699917 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the Role and Potential of Chatbots in Learning From the Perspective of Nursing Students: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Sep;72(3):e70060. doi: 10.1111/inr.70060. Int Nurs Rev. 2025. PMID: 40677016 Review.
-
Natural Language Processing Chatbot-Based Interventions for Improvement of Diet, Physical Activity, and Tobacco Smoking Behaviors: Systematic Review.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Jun 11;13:e66403. doi: 10.2196/66403. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025. PMID: 40503914 Free PMC article.
-
Women's Preferences and Willingness to Pay for AI Chatbots in Women's Health: Discrete Choice Experiment Study.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 10;27:e67303. doi: 10.2196/67303. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40493513 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Montenegro JLZ, da Costa CA, da Rosa Righi R. Survey of conversational agents in health. Expert Syst Appl. 2019 Sep;129:56–67. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.03.054. doi. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous