Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 13:12:e60205.
doi: 10.2196/60205.

User and Provider Experiences With Health Education Chatbots: Qualitative Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

User and Provider Experiences With Health Education Chatbots: Qualitative Systematic Review

Кyung-Eun Anna Choi et al. JMIR Hum Factors. .

Abstract

Background: Chatbots, as dialog-based platforms, have the potential to transform health education and behavior-change interventions. Despite the growing use of chatbots, qualitative insights into user and provider experiences remain underexplored, particularly with respect to experiences and perceptions, adoption factors, and the role of theoretical frameworks in design.

Objective: This systematic review of qualitative evidence aims to address three key research questions (RQs): (RQ1) user and provider experiences; (RQ2) facilitators and barriers to adoption; and (RQ3) role of theoretical frameworks.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect from January 1, 2018, to October 1, 2023, for English- or German-language, peer-reviewed qualitative or mixed methods studies. Studies were included if they examined users' or providers' experiences with chatbots in health education or behavior-change contexts. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts (Cohen κ=0.82). We used the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for quality assessment and conducted a reflexive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's framework.

Results: Among the 1754 records identified, 27 studies from 10 countries met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 241 qualitative-only participants and 10,802 mixed method participants (657 contributing qualitative data). For RQ1, users emphasized empathy and emotional connection. For RQ2, accessibility and ease of use emerged as facilitators, whereas trust deficits, technical glitches, and cultural misalignment were key barriers. For RQ3, the integration of behavior-change theories emerged as underutilized despite their potential to increase motivation.

Conclusions: Chatbots demonstrate strong potential for health education and behavior-change interventions but must address privacy and trust issues, embed robust theoretical underpinnings, and overcome adoption barriers to fully realize their impact. Future directions should include evaluations of cultural adaptability and rigorous ethical considerations in chatbot design.

Keywords: behavior change; chatbot; health education; personalization; privacy concerns; qualitative research.; user experience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow diagram of the study selection process.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Thematic interconnections in health care chatbot research.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Summary of the risk of bias assessment for the 27 included studies.

Similar articles

References

    1. Montenegro JLZ, da Costa CA, da Rosa Righi R. Survey of conversational agents in health. Expert Syst Appl. 2019 Sep;129:56–67. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.03.054. doi. - DOI
    1. Laranjo L, Dunn AG, Tong HL, et al. Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):1248–1258. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy072. doi. Medline. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aggarwal A, Tam CC, Wu D, Li X, Qiao S. Artificial intelligence-based chatbots for promoting health behavioral changes: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 24;25(1):e40789. doi: 10.2196/40789. doi. Medline. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bickmore TW, Pfeifer LM, Paasche-Orlow MK. Using computer agents to explain medical documents to patients with low health literacy. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jun;75(3):315–320. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.02.007. doi. Medline. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen YW, Wei J, Chen HL, Cheng CH, Hou IC. Developing a heart transplantation self-management support mobile health app in Taiwan: qualitative study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 19;8(8):e18999. doi: 10.2196/18999. doi. Medline. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources