Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul;134(7):439-449.
doi: 10.1038/s41437-025-00775-9. Epub 2025 Jun 13.

Transcriptomic basis of within- and trans-generational predator-induced plasticity in the freshwater snail Physa acuta

Affiliations

Transcriptomic basis of within- and trans-generational predator-induced plasticity in the freshwater snail Physa acuta

Léo Dejeux et al. Heredity (Edinb). 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Inducible defences in response to predation risk are a well-known example of adaptive phenotypic plasticity. Although inducible defences have been studied mainly within a generation (within-generational plasticity), there is now clear evidence that ancestral exposure to predation risk can influence the defences expressed by offspring, even if they have not been exposed themselves (transgenerational plasticity). The molecular mechanisms allowing the transmission of environmental information across generations are not well understood. In this study, we combined measures of antipredator responses (behavioural and morphological) with transcriptomic investigations across two generations in the freshwater snail Physa acuta. We hypothesised that both within- and transgenerational plasticity would induce phenotypic changes associated with differential gene expression. Our results confirmed within- and transgenerational plasticity: F1 snails respond to predator-cue exposure by increasing escape behaviour, reducing shell length, and developing thicker and slenderer shells, whereas F2 snails from exposed parents have longer and thicker shells with narrower apertures. Within- and transgenerational plasticity were accompanied by the differential expression of 112 genes (101 up- and 11 downregulated) and 23 differentially expressed genes (17 up- and 6 downregulated), respectively. Within- and transgenerational plasticity did not share common differentially expressed genes, but the associated molecular functions, involving metabolism and transcription regulation, were similar. These results suggest that predator-induced within-generational plasticity and transgenerational plasticity may result from different genomic pathways and may evolve independently.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics: This work did not require ethical approval from a human subject or animal welfare committee.

Similar articles

References

    1. Agrawal AA, Laforsch C, Tollrian R (1999) Transgenerational induction of defences in animals and plants. Nature 401(6748):6748. 10.1038/43425
    1. Aubin-Horth N, Renn SCP (2009) Genomic reaction norms: using integrative biology to understand molecular mechanisms of phenotypic plasticity. Mol Ecol 18(18):3763–3780. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04313.x - PubMed
    1. Auld JR, Houser R (2015) Age-dependent effects of predation risk on reproductive success in a freshwater snail. Evolution 69(10):2793–2798. 10.1111/evo.12769 - PubMed
    1. Auld JR, Relyea RA (2011) Adaptive plasticity in predator-induced defenses in a common freshwater snail: altered selection and mode of predation due to prey phenotype. Evol Ecol 25(1):189–202. 10.1007/s10682-010-9394-1
    1. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. J Stat Softw 67(1):1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01

LinkOut - more resources