Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Overall Survival in Patients With HCC Treated With Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab
- PMID: 40515751
- DOI: 10.1111/hepr.14224
Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Overall Survival in Patients With HCC Treated With Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the prognostic impact of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Dur/Tre).
Methods: A total of 182 patients with HCC who received Dur/Tre were included in the analysis. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were conducted. Additionally, hazard ratio (HR) spline curve analysis was used to determine the optimal NLR cut-off values for predicting overall survival (OS).
Results: The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.7-4.4), whereas the median OS was not reached (95% CI: 12.1 months-not reached). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that treatment with Dur/Tre as a second-line therapy or beyond was independently associated with worse PFS (HR: 1.819; 95% CI: 1.230-2.688; p = 0.003). Furthermore, an NLR of ≥ 2.56 was identified as an independent predictor of reduced OS (HR: 1.919; 95% CI: 1.033-3.566; p = 0.039). The median OS was not reached (95% CI: 12.3 months-not reached) in patients with an NLR of < 2.56, compared with 12.1 months (95% CI: 9.0 months-not reached) in those with an NLR of ≥ 2.56 (p = 0.016). A Sankey diagram illustrating post-treatment outcomes revealed that a significantly larger proportion of patients with high NLRs did not proceed to subsequent therapies but instead received best supportive care (p = 0.046). Spline curve analysis showed that an NLR range of approximately 2.3-3.0 represents an appropriate cut-off for predicting OS.
Conclusions: The NLR is a significant prognostic biomarker for OS in patients with HCC treated with Dur/Tre.
Keywords: durvalumab; hepatocellular carcinoma; neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio; overall survival; tremelimumab.
© 2025 Japan Society of Hepatology.
References
-
- F. Bray, M. Laversanne, H. Sung, et al., “Global Cancer Statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 74, no. 3 (2024): 229–263, https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834.
-
- J. M. Llovet, C. Brú, and J. Bruix, “Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: the BCLC Staging Classification,” Seminars in Liver Disease 19, no. 3 (1999): 329–338, https://doi.org/10.1055/s‐2007‐1007122.
-
- J. M. Llovet, A. Villanueva, J. A. Marrero, et al., “Trial Design and Endpoints in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: AASLD Consensus Conference,” Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) 73, no. S1 (2021): 158–191, https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.31327.
-
- J. M. Llovet, S. Ricci, V. Mazzaferro, et al., “Sorafenib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma,” New England Journal of Medicine 359, no. 4 (2008): 378–390, https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0708857.
-
- A. L. Cheng, Y. K. Kang, Z. Chen, et al., “Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib in Patients in the Asia‐Pacific Region With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Phase III Randomised, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Trial,” Lancet Oncology 10, no. 1 (2009): 25–34, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470‐2045(08)70285‐7.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources