Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 14.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11760-5. Online ahead of print.

Diagnostic value of dual-energy CT virtual monochromatic imaging for supraspinatus tendon injuries: a comparison with standard CT and MRI

Suwei Liu #  1 , Qizheng Wang #  1 , Yali Li #  1 , Ming Ni  1 , Chenyu Jiang  1 , Wenhuan Li  2 , Huishu Yuan  3
Affiliations

Diagnostic value of dual-energy CT virtual monochromatic imaging for supraspinatus tendon injuries: a comparison with standard CT and MRI

Suwei Liu et al. Eur Radiol. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) virtual monochromatic imaging with that of standard computed tomography (SCT) in evaluating supraspinatus tendon injuries.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study involved patients who underwent a single-source DECT system, 3.0-T MRI, and shoulder arthroscopy within 14 days. Three radiologists independently and randomly evaluated SCT, mono+ 50 keV, mono+ 90 keV, and MRI images to detect supraspinatus tendon tears and recorded their diagnostic confidence. Regions of interest were delineated to measure the CT attenuation values of torn, degenerated, and normal tendon regions in SCT, mono+ 50 keV, and mono+ 90 keV images.

Results: A total of 100 patients with supraspinatus tendon injuries were included. Significant differences in detecting supraspinatus tendon injuries were observed between SCT and DECT (p < 0.05) and between SCT and MRI (p < 0.05), without showing differences in detecting supraspinatus tears between DECT and MRI. CT attenuation values of tears in SCT, mono+ 50 keV, and mono+ 90 keV images were significantly lower than those of degenerative and normal regions (p < 0.001). Optimal CT attenuation values to differentiate between tears and degeneration on SCT, mono+ 50 Kev, and mono+ 90 Kev were 17.4, 28.0, and 14.2 with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.920, 0.978, and 0.938, respectively. Additionally, these values between degeneration and normal regions were 23.8 HU, 36.1 HU, and 19.6 HU with AUCs of 0.967, 0.970, and 0.946, respectively.

Conclusion: DECT demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and reliability for qualitative and quantitative assessment of supraspinatus tendon injuries.

Key points: Question Is DECT virtual monochromatic imaging capable of diagnosing supraspinatus tendon injuries when MRI is unavailable or contraindicated? Findings DECT demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and reliability for qualitative and quantitative assessment of supraspinatus tendon injuries. Clinical relevance DECT can effectively and reliably diagnose supraspinatus tendon tears using both qualitative and quantitative methods and holds promise as a supplementary tool for MRI.

Keywords: Diagnosis; Dual-energy scanned projection; Magnetic resonance imaging; Shoulder pain; Supraspinatus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethical standards. Guarantor: The scientific guarantor of this publication is Huishu Yuan. Conflict of interest: W.L. is affiliated with GE Healthcare. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest. Statistics and biometry: Wenhuan Li kindly provided statistical advice for this manuscript. One of the authors has significant statistical expertise. Informed consent: Written informed consent was not required for this study because retrospective study. Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board. Ethical approval: Peking University Third Hospital Institutional Review Board approval was obtained (M2024188). Study subjects or cohorts overlap: Some study subjects or cohorts have not been previously reported in a paper or study. Methodology: Retrospective Diagnostic study Single-center study

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Zoga AC, Kamel SI, Hynes JP, Kavanagh EC, O’Connor PJ, Forster BB (2021) The evolving roles of MRI and ultrasound in first-line imaging of rotator cuff injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 217:1390–1400. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.21.25606 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ramme AJ, Robbins CB, Patel KA et al (2019) Surgical versus nonsurgical management of rotator cuff tears: a matched-pair analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 101:1775–1782. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.01473 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yazigi Junior JA, Anauate Nicolao F, Matsunaga FT et al (2021) Supraspinatus tears: predictability of magnetic resonance imaging findings based on clinical examination. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 30:1834–1843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winter L, Seifert F, Zilberti L, Murbach M, Ittermann B (2021) MRI-related heating of implants and devices: a review. J Magn Reson Imaging 53:1646–1665. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27194 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gruenewald LD, Koch V, Martin SS et al (2023) Diagnostic value of DECT-based colored collagen maps for the assessment of cruciate ligaments in patients with acute trauma. Eur Radiol 33:6339–6350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09558-4 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources