Diagnostic Accuracy of Hepatic MRI-PDFF and R2* for the Evaluation of Liver Steatosis and Liver Iron Overload: A Meta-analysis
- PMID: 40517098
- DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.05.051
Diagnostic Accuracy of Hepatic MRI-PDFF and R2* for the Evaluation of Liver Steatosis and Liver Iron Overload: A Meta-analysis
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of hepatic magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) and R2* using the multi-echo Dixon technique for the evaluation of liver steatosis (LS) and liver iron overload (LIO). The study focuses on the determination of optimal cutoff values and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) as primary measures of diagnostic performance.
Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was conducted by two independent researchers. The diagnostic accuracy of studies was assessed using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies-2. The AUROCs of MRI-PDFF (for LS grades: 0 versus 1-3, 0-1 versus 2-3, and 0-2 versus 3) and R2* (for LIO grades: 0 versus 1-4) were compared and analyzed. Meta-regression analyses were performed to explore sources of heterogeneity in MRI-PDFF. The review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines.
Result: 29 studies with 4548 subjects (2565 males) were investigated. The summary AUROC values of MRI-PDFF for classifying LS grades 0 versus 1-3, 0-1 versus 2-3, and 0-2 versus 3 were 0.95 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93-0.97), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95), and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95), respectively. The summary AUROC values of R2* for classifying LIO grades 0 versus 1-4 was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.84). The optimal MRI-PDFF cutoffs for diagnosing LS were identified as 4.4% (LS ≥ G1), 13.34% (LS ≥ G2), and 16.9% (LS ≥ G3), while the optimal R2* cutoffs for LIO ≥ G1 were 60.5 s⁻¹ (3 T MRI).
Conclusion: MRI-PDFF and R2* demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for evaluating LS and LIO, with established optimal cutoff values supporting their clinical utility as non-invasive diagnostic tools. These findings provide a standardized reference for MRI-based liver fat and iron quantification in clinical practice.
Keywords: Cutoff values; Iron overload; Liver steatosis; Magnetic resonance imaging; R2*.
Copyright © 2025 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic accuracy of hepatic proton density fat fraction measured by magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of liver steatosis with histology as reference standard: a meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2019 Oct;29(10):5180-5189. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06071-5. Epub 2019 Mar 15. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30877459
-
3D Multi-Echo Dixon technique for simultaneous assessment of liver steatosis and iron overload in patients with chronic liver diseases: a feasibility study.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019 Jun;9(6):1014-1024. doi: 10.21037/qims.2019.05.20. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019. PMID: 31367555 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic value of MRI-PDFF for hepatic steatosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2019 Jul;29(7):3564-3573. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06072-4. Epub 2019 Mar 21. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30899974 Review.
-
Cutoff Values for Diagnosing Hepatic Steatosis Using Contemporary MRI-Proton Density Fat Fraction Measuring Methods.Korean J Radiol. 2022 Dec;23(12):1260-1268. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0334. Korean J Radiol. 2022. PMID: 36447414 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of MRI proton density fat fraction in hepatic steatosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2025 Apr;35(4):1794-1807. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11001-1. Epub 2024 Sep 10. Eur Radiol. 2025. PMID: 39254718
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
