Vaginal pulse amplitude response patterns during erotic conditions and sleep
- PMID: 4051720
- DOI: 10.1007/BF01550848
Vaginal pulse amplitude response patterns during erotic conditions and sleep
Abstract
Vaginal photoplethysmography has been used to investigate sexual arousal response patterns in small samples of sexually functional and dysfunctional women, but selection of subjects for these studies has not been of a standardized nature. In the present study, two groups of women, who placed in either the upper or lower percentile ranks on the Sexual Arousal Inventory (Hoon et al., 1976a), were compared on a physiological measure of sexual arousal, vaginal pulse amplitude (VPA), during both waking erotic conditions and sleep. As hypothesized, no differences in VPA were found between groups during either waking or sleeping conditions. Contrary to expectation, groups also did not differ on subjective ratings of their laboratory arousal. With both groups combined, differences in VPA levels were evident between baseline and erotic conditions. Similarly, VPA levels differed between stages of sleep, with highest levels observed during rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep. These findings suggest that self-reported low arousability is not based on lack of physiological response and that retrospective, self-report measures of sexual arousability differ in important ways from subjective and physiological measures of sexual arousal in the laboratory. In order to adequately assess sexual arousability, future researchers must either devise laboratory conditions that more closely resemble erotic stimuli occurring in subjects' natural environments or validate physiological measures of arousal in nonlaboratory settings. Finally, the nocturnal evaluation of VPA seems potentially useful for cases in which organic factors may be contributing to sexual dysfunction.
Similar articles
-
Differences in Perceived and Physiologic Genital Arousal Between Women With and Without Sexual Dysfunction.J Sex Med. 2018 Jan;15(1):52-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.11.009. J Sex Med. 2018. PMID: 29289375
-
The sensitivity of continuous laboratory measures of physiological and subjective sexual arousal for diagnosing women with sexual arousal disorder.J Sex Med. 2010 Feb;7(2 Pt 2):938-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01548.x. J Sex Med. 2010. PMID: 20487501
-
Sexual arousal in East Asian and Euro-Canadian women: a psychophysiological study.J Sex Med. 2010 Sep;7(9):3066-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01916.x. J Sex Med. 2010. PMID: 20584121
-
The way COVID-19 transforms our sexual lives.Int J Impot Res. 2022 Mar;34(2):117-119. doi: 10.1038/s41443-021-00494-9. Epub 2021 Nov 23. Int J Impot Res. 2022. PMID: 34815550 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Physiologic measures of sexual function in women: a review.Fertil Steril. 2009 Jul;92(1):19-34. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.041. Epub 2008 Nov 30. Fertil Steril. 2009. PMID: 19046582 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Sexual dysfunction in the diabetes female: a review.Arch Sex Behav. 1988 Jun;17(3):277-84. doi: 10.1007/BF01541746. Arch Sex Behav. 1988. PMID: 3044298 Review.
-
Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: a meta-analysis.Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Feb;39(1):5-56. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9556-9. Epub 2010 Jan 5. Arch Sex Behav. 2010. PMID: 20049519 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Control of sleep and wakefulness.Physiol Rev. 2012 Jul;92(3):1087-187. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00032.2011. Physiol Rev. 2012. PMID: 22811426 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Empirical Status of the Preparation Hypothesis: Explicating Women's Genital Responses to Sexual Stimuli in the Laboratory.Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Feb;51(2):709-728. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01599-5. Epub 2020 Feb 5. Arch Sex Behav. 2022. PMID: 32026221 Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials