Assessment of chemical footprints of hydrophobic pesticide/biocide contamination in western Kenya using polydimethylsiloxane silicone passive samplers
- PMID: 40518067
- DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126652
Assessment of chemical footprints of hydrophobic pesticide/biocide contamination in western Kenya using polydimethylsiloxane silicone passive samplers
Abstract
In a previous study based on LC-HRMS screening of pesticides and other organic micropollutants, it was shown that pesticide pollution of water resources in western Kenya poses a significant risk to aquatic and human health. In the current study, this assessment was completed with the investigation of more hydrophobic organochlorine, organophosphate and pyrethroid pesticides in surface waters and wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) influents and effluents using polydimethylsiloxane silicone passive samplers and Gas Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS/MS). Chemical footprints were assessed based on the mixture risks of the detected pesticides on algae, fish and crustaceans determined using the Toxic Unit approach. In total, 19 additional pesticides could be detected. The highest concentrations were found for chlorpyrifos with 263 ng/L in rivers, 717 ng/L in WWTP influents and 143 ng/L in WWTP effluents. Organochlorine and pyrethroid pesticide concentrations were detectable in concentrations up to 1 respective 2 ng/L. Driven mainly by chlorpyrifos, 93 % of river samples and 88 % of WWTP effluent samples posed acute risks to crustaceans, while 64 % and 63 % of river and WWTP effluent samples, respectively, exceeded chronic risk thresholds for fish. Risks to algae were low. Chlorpyrifos was the main driver of the chemical footprint of pesticide application on crustaceans and fish. In comparison to the previously screened LC-HRMS compounds, none of the hydrophobic compounds analyzed here contributed significantly to the footprint on algae, which is dominated by more hydrophilic herbicides.
Keywords: Chemical footprint; Passive samplers; Pesticides; Risk assessment; Surface water; Wastewater.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Impact of wastewater treatment plants on pesticide contamination in the Yeongsan River basin and prioritization of pesticides in wastewater treatment plant effluents.J Hazard Mater. 2025 Aug 15;494:138660. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138660. Epub 2025 May 17. J Hazard Mater. 2025. PMID: 40393288
-
Comparative performance evaluation of triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry and orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometry for analysis of antibiotics in creek water impacted by CETP discharge.Analyst. 2025 Aug 4;150(16):3587-3601. doi: 10.1039/d5an00482a. Analyst. 2025. PMID: 40662224
-
A decade-long meta-analysis of risks posed by pesticides in Chinese surface waters.J Environ Manage. 2025 Jul;387:125898. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125898. Epub 2025 May 21. J Environ Manage. 2025. PMID: 40403657
-
Monitoring, sources, receptors, and control measures for three European Union watch list substances of emerging concern in receiving waters - A 20year systematic review.Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jan 1;574:1140-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.084. Epub 2016 Oct 14. Sci Total Environ. 2017. PMID: 27741430
-
Pesticide water pollution, human health risks, and regulatory evaluation: A nationwide analysis in Ethiopia.J Hazard Mater. 2024 Oct 5;478:135326. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135326. Epub 2024 Jul 25. J Hazard Mater. 2024. PMID: 39116746 Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous