Factors Influencing the Reliability of Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice: A Scoping Review
- PMID: 40518356
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.05.021
Factors Influencing the Reliability of Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice: A Scoping Review
Abstract
Objectives: The primary objective of this scoping review is to identify and summarize the factors influencing the reliability of the auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice reported in the existing literature. The secondary objective is to identify the factors affecting the reliability of the auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice that have empirical support.
Study design: Scoping review.
Methods: Nine online databases were searched, and a backward search was conducted to identify studies that examined the factors affecting rater reliability in the auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice. Our initial online and manual search revealed 2643 studies, of which 101 sources met the eligibility criteria for data extraction.
Results: The scoping review revealed 6 broad factors and 17 subfactors that may influence rater reliability on the auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice. The most studied factor was voice samples (22.0%), followed by vocal parameters and rater characteristics (20.5%), rating scales (15.7%), training (13.4%), and rating tasks (7.9%). Thirty-two studies reported reliability indices and conducted statistical tests for the differences in reliability. Among these factors, the most frequent were training and rating scales (28.6%), voice samples (17.1%), rater characteristics and rating tasks (11.4%), and vocal parameters (2.9%).
Conclusions: The findings of this review allow researchers, clinicians, and educators to understand the various factors that affect the reliability of the auditory-perceptual evaluations of voice. The results may also guide researchers and educators in developing training programs for less experienced clinicians to improve their reliability in the auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice.
Keywords: Adult; Auditory perception; Reliability; Speech perception; Voice disorders; Voice quality.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Quality of Cochlear-implanted and Normal-hearing Individuals: A Reliability Study.J Voice. 2017 Nov;31(6):774.e1-774.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Mar 16. J Voice. 2017. PMID: 28318969
-
The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Psychometric Characteristics: II European Portuguese Version (II EP CAPE-V).J Voice. 2019 Jul;33(4):582.e5-582.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Jun 20. J Voice. 2019. PMID: 29936062
-
The effect of anchor modality on the reliability of vocal severity ratings.J Voice. 2009 May;23(3):341-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.10.006. Epub 2008 Mar 17. J Voice. 2009. PMID: 18346869 Clinical Trial.
-
The Relationship Between Voice Parameters and Speech Intelligibility: A Scoping Review.J Voice. 2024 May 15:S0892-1997(24)00130-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.04.013. Online ahead of print. J Voice. 2024. PMID: 38755076 Review.
-
The Use of Auditory-Perceptual Training as a Research Method: A Summary Review.J Voice. 2022 May;36(3):322-334. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.06.032. Epub 2020 Aug 1. J Voice. 2022. PMID: 32747174 Review.
Cited by
-
Acoustic Metrics of the Strain Dimension of Voice Quality: A Scoping Review.J Voice. 2025 Sep 3:S0892-1997(25)00337-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.08.018. Online ahead of print. J Voice. 2025. PMID: 40908240 Review.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous