Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 14:S0892-1997(25)00206-1.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.05.021. Online ahead of print.

Factors Influencing the Reliability of Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice: A Scoping Review

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Factors Influencing the Reliability of Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice: A Scoping Review

Zikai Wang et al. J Voice. .
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: The primary objective of this scoping review is to identify and summarize the factors influencing the reliability of the auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice reported in the existing literature. The secondary objective is to identify the factors affecting the reliability of the auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice that have empirical support.

Study design: Scoping review.

Methods: Nine online databases were searched, and a backward search was conducted to identify studies that examined the factors affecting rater reliability in the auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice. Our initial online and manual search revealed 2643 studies, of which 101 sources met the eligibility criteria for data extraction.

Results: The scoping review revealed 6 broad factors and 17 subfactors that may influence rater reliability on the auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice. The most studied factor was voice samples (22.0%), followed by vocal parameters and rater characteristics (20.5%), rating scales (15.7%), training (13.4%), and rating tasks (7.9%). Thirty-two studies reported reliability indices and conducted statistical tests for the differences in reliability. Among these factors, the most frequent were training and rating scales (28.6%), voice samples (17.1%), rater characteristics and rating tasks (11.4%), and vocal parameters (2.9%).

Conclusions: The findings of this review allow researchers, clinicians, and educators to understand the various factors that affect the reliability of the auditory-perceptual evaluations of voice. The results may also guide researchers and educators in developing training programs for less experienced clinicians to improve their reliability in the auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice.

Keywords: Adult; Auditory perception; Reliability; Speech perception; Voice disorders; Voice quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources