Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 16.
doi: 10.1111/den.15060. Online ahead of print.

World Endoscopy Organization guidelines on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography biliary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques

Affiliations
Review

World Endoscopy Organization guidelines on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography biliary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques

Stefano Francesco Crinò et al. Dig Endosc. .

Abstract

Recent guidelines on biliary cannulation are lacking. This guideline is an initiative of the World Endoscopy Organization (WEO) with the involvement of a panel of experts from Asia, Europe, and America. Relevant clinical questions on four areas (post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP] pancreatitis [PEP] prophylaxis, biliary cannulation techniques, sphincterotomy/papillary balloon dilation, and biliary cannulation in special circumstances) were developed and answered after systematic reviews of the literature and using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. Successful biliary cannulation and sphincterotomy are cornerstones of ERCP and are indispensable for almost all therapeutic and advanced diagnostic procedures. However, adverse events, particularly PEP, may commonly occur and impair patients' outcomes. A high cannulation rate and a low rate of PEP are quality indicators for ERCP and should be the goal of all endoscopists. With this guideline we aimed to provide clinical practice advice applicable worldwide, regardless of resources and expertise availability. The main recommendations focus on specific aspects of ERCP, including pre-, intra-, and postprocedural measures to reduce the risk of PEP, the technique for an initial biliary cannulation attempt, options for cannulation in cases of difficult biliary access, alternatives to ERCP in case of failure (percutaneous- and endoscopic ultrasound-guided), and biliary access in altered anatomy (periampullary diverticulum and postsurgical anatomy) and in the presence of duodenal stenosis.

Keywords: biliary stricture; difficult biliary cannulation; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; papillary dilation; post‐ERCP pancreatitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. DeBenedet AT, Elmunzer BJ, McCarthy ST, Elta GH, Schoenfeld PS. Intraprocedural quality in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A meta‐analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 1696–1704; quiz 705.
    1. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P et al. Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large‐scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio‐pancreatograph practice. Gut 2007; 56: 821–829.
    1. Testoni PA, Mariani A, Aabakken L et al. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 657–683.
    1. Domagk D, Oppong KW, Aabakken L et al. Performance measures for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 1116–1127.
    1. Liao WC, Angsuwatcharakon P, Isayama H et al. International consensus recommendations for difficult biliary access. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 295–304.