Diagnostic Value of Inflammatory Markers in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Clinical and Endoscopic Correlations
- PMID: 40519394
- PMCID: PMC12163360
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.84073
Diagnostic Value of Inflammatory Markers in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Clinical and Endoscopic Correlations
Abstract
Background The incidence of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) has increased over the last century. Despite the unclear etiology of IBD, significant advancements have been made in recent years to understand the development of this disease. Objectives The aim of this study was to examine the diagnostic significance of several inflammatory biomarkers and their associations with clinical and endoscopic disease activity in patients with IBD. Methods This case-control study involved 68 patients, 34 with Crohn's disease (CD) and 34 with ulcerative colitis (UC), with IBD confirmed by endoscopy and histopathology, and 52 healthy subjects as a control group. A pre-designed questionnaire was completed for each subject. Stool samples were taken for fecal calprotectin (FC) measurement by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and a blood sample was obtained for complete blood and differential counts using a hematology autoanalyzer, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum C-reactive protein (CRP) by Cobas (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), and measurements of interleukins (IL-6, IL-17A, IL-8, and IL-1β) by ELISA. Comparisons of parameters were considered statistically significant at the P < 0.05 interval. Results The mean levels of ESR, CRP, FC, all measured ILs, neutrophil number and percentage (%), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet number were statistically significantly higher in patients with IBD compared to the control group. However, lymphocyte%, lymphocyte-mid-size leukocytes ratio (LMR), hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), hematocrit, and red cell distribution width (RDW) were significantly lower in patients with IBD compared to controls. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses showed that FC, IL-8, and ESR, respectively, have the highest area under the curve (AUC) and were of the highest validity to differentiate between patients with IBD and healthy subjects, followed by CRP and IL-1β. Conclusion All the studied ILs were increased in patients with IBD; their increases were not different between UC and CD patients. FC, IL-8, and ESR were of the highest validity for the diagnosis of IBD. Findings collectively highlight the validity of the measured parameters as potential biomarkers in IBD.
Keywords: biomarkers; crohn’s disease (cd); endoscopy; inflammatory bowel disease; inflammatory mediators; ulcerative colitis (uc).
Copyright © 2025, Omer et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Research Ethics Committee, College of Medicine, University of Duhok issued approval (18082021-8-13). Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Similar articles
-
Fecal calprotectin and its correlation with inflammatory markers and endoscopy in patients from India with inflammatory bowel disease.Indian J Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov;34(6):431-5. doi: 10.1007/s12664-015-0608-x. Epub 2015 Nov 21. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26589229
-
Red cell distribution width for assessment of activity of inflammatory bowel disease.Dig Dis Sci. 2009 Apr;54(4):842-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0436-2. Epub 2008 Aug 21. Dig Dis Sci. 2009. PMID: 18716874
-
Efficacy of noninvasive evaluations in monitoring inflammatory bowel disease activity: A prospective study in China.World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Dec 14;23(46):8235-8247. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i46.8235. World J Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 29290660 Free PMC article.
-
Visceral adiposity and inflammatory bowel disease.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Nov;36(11):2305-2319. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03968-w. Epub 2021 Jun 9. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021. PMID: 34104989 Review.
-
Laboratory markers in IBD: useful, magic, or unnecessary toys?Gut. 2006 Mar;55(3):426-31. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.069476. Gut. 2006. PMID: 16474109 Free PMC article. Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous