What is the optimal block selection paradigm for predicting a successful treatment outcome following sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy? A real-world cohort study
- PMID: 40519792
- PMCID: PMC12167009
- DOI: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100599
What is the optimal block selection paradigm for predicting a successful treatment outcome following sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy? A real-world cohort study
Abstract
Background: Outcomes following sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy (SLBRFN) likely depend on patient selection criteria; however, commonly used criteria vary considerably. Refinement of selection criteria for SLBRFN may improve treatment outcomes. This study investigated common prognostic block-based selection criteria and treatment success following SLBRFN.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, consecutive patients from two Canadian musculoskeletal pain management clinics who underwent SLBRFN over a 6-year period (2016-2022) were identified by electronic medical record. Patients were categorized according to several prognostic block paradigms based on number of blocks (single vs. dual), block type (lateral branch block [LBB] vs. intra-articular block [IAB]), and subsequent percentage of pain relief. Six block criteria were established: 1 = LBB/LBB≥80 %; 2 = IAB/LBB≥80 %; 3 = LBB/LBB 50-79 %; 4 = IAB/LBB 50-79 %; 5 = LBB≥80 %; 6 = LBB 50-79 %. Treatment success was assessed at three months post-SLBRFN using two criteria: (1) the primary study outcome of ≥50 % numerical rating scale (NRS) pain reduction and (2) a secondary outcome of Pain Disability Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (PDQQ) score improvement by the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Logistic regression analyses evaluated the association between block criteria and treatment success following SLBRFN.
Results: 281 consecutive patients (75.1 % female, 61.8 ± 14.2 years of age, BMI 29.4 ± 6.6 kg/m2) were included. Cohort success rates for pain and functional improvement were 43.4 % (95 % CI: 37.8-49.3) and 46.6 % (95 % CI: 40.9-52.5), respectively. After adjusting for demographics and cannula type/SLBRFN technique, none of the odds ratios for the six prognostic block paradigms showed statistical significance.
Conclusion: Nearly 50 % of patients who underwent SLBRFN reported clinically significant improvement in pain and disability at three months post-procedure, regardless of prognostic block selection criteria. These results suggest that multiple block strategies may determine eligibility for SLBRFN.
Keywords: Radiofrequency ablation; Radiofrequency neurotomy; Sacral lateral branch; Sacroiliac joint pain.
© 2025 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Zachary L. McCormick reports a relationship with International Pain & Spine Intervention Society that includes: board membership. Zachary L. McCormick reports a relationship with Avanos Medical Inc that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. Zachary L. McCormick reports a relationship with Boston Scientific Corporation that includes: funding grants. Zachary L. McCormick reports a relationship with Saol Therapeutics that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. Zachary L. McCormick reports a relationship with Spine Biopharma that includes: funding grants. Zachary L. McCormick reports a relationship with SPR Therapeutics Inc that includes: funding grants. Zachary L. McCormick reports a relationship with Stratus Medical that includes: funding grants. Zachary L. McCormick reports a relationship with Stryker that includes: consulting or advisory. Taylor R Burnham reports a relationship with Diros Technology Inc that includes: funding grants. Taylor R Burnham reports a relationship with Avanos Medical Inc that includes: consulting or advisory. Aaron M Conger reports a relationship with Stratus that includes: funding grants. Robert Burnham reports a relationship with International Pain & Spine Intervention Society that includes: funding grants. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
The effectiveness of sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy for posterior sacroiliac joint complex pain in patients selected by dual sacral lateral branch blocks; A real-world cohort study.Interv Pain Med. 2024 Oct 30;3(4):100442. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100442. eCollection 2024 Dec. Interv Pain Med. 2024. PMID: 39552632 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness and safety of sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy (SLBRFN): A systematic review.Interv Pain Med. 2023 Jun 16;2(2):100259. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100259. eCollection 2023 Jun. Interv Pain Med. 2023. PMID: 39238662 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluating prognostic block selection criteria in cervical medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy: A retrospective cohort study.Interv Pain Med. 2025 Mar 19;4(1):100559. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100559. eCollection 2025 Mar. Interv Pain Med. 2025. PMID: 40201072 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness and predictive factors of Sacroiliac Joint Radiofrequency Neurotomy success - A retrospective cohort study.Interv Pain Med. 2023 Aug 8;2(3):100271. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100271. eCollection 2023 Sep. Interv Pain Med. 2023. PMID: 39238916 Free PMC article.
-
The Effectiveness of Cervical Medial Branch Thermal Radiofrequency Neurotomy Stratified by Selection Criteria: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Pain Med. 2020 Nov 1;21(11):2726-2737. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa219. Pain Med. 2020. PMID: 32935126
References
-
- Lee D.W., Cheney C., Sherwood D., Wahezi S., Monteiro P., McCormick Z.L., Conger A., Duszynski B., Smith C.C. The effectiveness and safety of sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy (SLBRFN): a systematic review. Interv Pain Med. 2023;2(2) doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100259. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Loh E., Burnham T., Burnham R. Sacroiliac joint diagnostic block and radiofrequency ablation techniques. Phys Med Rehabil Clin. 2021;32(4):725–744. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources