Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 11:11:20552076251349890.
doi: 10.1177/20552076251349890. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

Digital health capacity and pediatric care quality in LMICs: A large-scale analysis of 5311 health facilities

Affiliations

Digital health capacity and pediatric care quality in LMICs: A large-scale analysis of 5311 health facilities

Dan Wang et al. Digit Health. .

Abstract

Objective: Digital health technologies are crucial for achieving universal health coverage (UHC), especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with limited digital infrastructure. This study aimed to assess digital health capacity across multiple LMICs and evaluate its association with evidence-based practice (EBP) and patient-centered care (PCC).

Methods: We analyzed Service Provision Assessment data collected over the past decade, spanning 5311 facilities and 20,880 pediatric visits across eight LMICs. Digital health capacity was measured using the WHO Classification of Digital Health Interventions (CDHI) across five domains: digital infrastructure, client engagement, healthcare providers, data services, and health system managers. EBP was assessed via ten binary items, while PCC was derived from eleven exit interview items using exploratory factor analysis. Multilevel regression models explored relationships between digital health capacity and both EBP and PCC.

Results: Overall digital health capacity was low (mean = 0.35), with notably low scores for digital infrastructure (0.02), healthcare providers (0.21), and health system managers (0.06). Digital health capacity was significantly associated with improved EBP (Coef. = 0.146, p < 0.001), particularly through digital infrastructure (Coef. = 0.183, p = 0.029), client engagement (Coef. = 0.205, p < 0.001), and provider capacity (Coef. = 0.142, p < 0.001). No significant effect emerged for PCC (Coef.=-0.013, p = 0.531).

Conclusions: The level of digital health technology in LMICs is generally insufficient, particularly in terms of digital infrastructure, healthcare provider training and health system managers. Although the implementation of digital health technologies has the potential to improve the EBP, its effect on enhancing PCC is relatively limited.

Keywords: Digital health; evidence-based practice; low- and middle-income countries; patient-centered care; pediatric care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
National variation in digital health capacity and sub-dimensions across eight LMICs. Note: Heatmap showing the mean facility-level scores for digital health capacity and its five functional domains across eight LMICs. Data are weighted and derived from SPA surveys (2014–2022). Digital Health scores are rescaled from 0–5 to 0–1 for visualization purposes. Original regression analyses were conducted using the unstandardized total score (range: 0–5). “Mean” represents the average across countries.

Similar articles

References

    1. Estimation UNI-aGfCM. Levels & Trends in Child Mortality: Report 2022, estimates developed by the United Nations Inter-agency Group of Child Mortality Estimation. New York, NY: United Nations Children's Fund, 2024.
    1. Braveman P, Gottlieb L. The social determinants of health: it's time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Rep 2014; 129: 19–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kruk ME, Lewis TP, Arsenault C, et al. Improving health and social systems for all children in LMICs: structural innovations to deliver high-quality services. Lancet 2022; 399: 1830–1844. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marmot M, Allen J, Bell R, et al. WHO European review of social determinants of health and the health divide. Lancet 2012; 380: 1011–1029. - PubMed
    1. Solar O, Irwin A. A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Document Production Services, 2010.

LinkOut - more resources