Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 16.
doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02201-w. Online ahead of print.

Estimating the Replicability of Sports and Exercise Science Research

Jennifer Murphy  1 Aaron R Caldwell  2 Cristian Mesquida  3   4 Aera J M Ladell  5 Alberto Encarnación-Martínez  6 Alexandre Tual  7 Andrew Denys  8 Bailey Cameron  9 Bas Van Hooren  10 Ben Parr  11 Bianca DeLucia  12 Billy R J Mason  13 Brad Clark  13 Brendan Egan  14 Calum Brown  15 Carl Ade  16 Chiarella Sforza  17 Christopher B Taber  18 Christopher Kirk  15 Christopher McCrum  10 Cian OKeeffe Tighe  3 Ciara Byrne  3 Claudia Brunetti  17 Cyril Forestier  7 Dan Martin  19 Danny Taylor  19 David Diggin  20 Dearbhla Gallagher  21 Deborah L King  20 Elizabeth Rogers  16 Eric C Bennett  5 Eric T Lopatofsky  18 Gemma Dunn  21 Gérome C Gauchar  22 Guillaume Mornieux  22 Ignacio Catalá-Vilaplana  23 Ines Caetan  19 Inmaculada Aparicio-Aparicio  6 Jack Barnes  15 Jake Blaisdell  20 James Steele  9 Jared R Fletcher  5 Jasmin Hutchinson  12 Jason Au  24 Jason P Oliemans  5 Javad Bakhshinejad  12 Joaquin Barrios  25 Jose Ignacio Priego Quesada  6 Joseph Rager  26 Julia B Capon  5 Julie S J Walton  27 Kailey Stevens  24 Katie Heinrich  16 Kelly Wu  28 Kenneth Meijer  10 Laura Richards  21 Lauren Jutlah  24 Le Tong  8 Lee Bridgeman  9 Leo Banet  22 Leonard Mbiyu  26 Lucy Sefton  26 Margaret de Chanaleilles  7 Maria Charisi  28 Matthew Beerse  25 Matthew J Major  28 Maya Caon  29 Mel Bargh  19 Michael Rowley  8 Miguel Vaca Moran  28 Nicholas Croker  12 Nicolas C Hanen  22 Nicole Montague  3 Noel E Brick  11 Oliver R Runswick  26 Paul Willems  10 Pedro Pérez-Soriano  6 Rebecca Blake  30 Rebecca Jones  19 Rebecca Louise Quinn  11 Roberto Sanchis-Sanchis  6 Rodrigo Rabello  17 Roisin Bolger  11 Roy Shohat  29 Sadie Cotton  20 Samantha Chua  9 Samuel Norwood  29 Samuel Vimeau  29 Sandro Dias  19 Sissel Pedersen  10 Spencer S Skaper  5 Taylor Coyle  3 Terun Desai  31 Thomas I Gee  19 Tobias Edwards  15 Torsten Pohl  32 Vanessa Yingling  8 Vinicius Ribeiro  29 Youri Duchene  22 Zacharias Papadakis  29 Joe P Warne  3
Affiliations

Estimating the Replicability of Sports and Exercise Science Research

Jennifer Murphy et al. Sports Med. .

Abstract

Background: The replicability of sports and exercise research has not been assessed previously despite concerns about scientific practices within the field.

Aim: This study aims to provide an initial estimate of the replicability of applied sports and exercise science research published in quartile 1 journals (SCImago journal ranking for 2019 in the Sports Science subject category; www.scimagojr.com ) between 2016 and 2021.

Methods: A formalised selection protocol for this replication project was previously published. Voluntary collaborators were recruited, and studies were allocated in a stratified and randomised manner on the basis of equipment and expertise. Original authors were contacted to provide deidentified raw data, to review preregistrations and to provide methodological clarifications. A multiple inferential strategy was employed to analyse the replication data. The same analysis (i.e. F test or t test) was used to determine whether the replication effect size was statistically significant and in the same direction as the original effect size. Z-tests were used to determine whether the original and replication effect size estimates were compatible or significantly different in magnitude.

Results: In total, 25 replication studies were included for analysis. Of the 25, 10 replications used paired t tests, 1 used an independent t test and 14 used an analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the statistical analyses. In all, 7 (28%) studies demonstrated robust replicability, meeting all three validation criteria: achieving statistical significance (p < 0.05) in the same direction as the original study and showing compatible effect size magnitudes as per the Z test (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: There was a substantial decrease in the published effect size estimate magnitudes when replicated; therefore, sports and exercise science researchers should consider effect size uncertainty when conducting subsequent power analyses. Additionally, there were many barriers to conducting the replication studies, e.g., original author communication and poor data and reporting transparency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval: Ethical approval was obtained at each local university, and all studies were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent to participate: All participants provided consent to participate. Funding: Open Access funding provided by the IReL Consortium. This work was supported by the Irish Research Council’s Government of Ireland Postgraduate Scholarship Programme [GOIPG/2020/1155]. Conflict of interest: The authors report there are no competing interests to declare. Availability of data and material: Raw data, code and other supplementary materials are available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/SFBVA . Author contributions: Jennifer Murphy: conceptualisation (equal), data curation (lead), formal analysis (equal), funding acquisition (lead), investigation (lead), methodology (equal) and writing – original draft preparation (lead). Aaron R. Caldwell: conceptualisation (equal), methodology (equal), supervision, formal analysis (equal) and writing – review and editing (equal). Cristian Mesquida: conceptualisation (equal). Joe P. Warne: conceptualisation (equal), methodology (equal), supervision (lead) and writing – review and editing (equal). Aera J. M. Ladell, Alberto Encarnación-Martínez, Alexandre Tual, Andrew Denys, Bailey Cameron, Bas Van Hooren, Ben Parr, Bianca DeLucia, Billy R. J. Mason, Brad Clark, Brendan Egan, Calum Brown, Carl Ade, Chiarella Sforza, Christopher B. Taber, Christopher Kirk, Christopher McCrum, Cian O. Keeffe Tighe, Ciara Byrne, Claudia Brunetti, Cyril Forestier, Dan Martin, Danny Taylor, David Diggin, Dearbhla Gallagher, Deborah L. King, Elizabeth Rogers, Eric C. Bennett, Eric T. Lopatofsky, Gemma Dunn, Gérome C. Gauchar, Guillaume Mornieux, Ignacio Catalá-Vilaplana, Ines Caetan, Inmaculada Aparicio-Aparicio, Jack Barnes, Jake Blaisdell, James Steele, Jared R. Fletcher, Jasmin Hutchinson, Jason Au, Jason P. Oliemans, Javad Bakhshinejad, Joaquin Barrios, Jose Ignacio Priego Quesada, Joseph Rager, Julia B. Capon, Julie S. J. Walton, Kailey Stevens, Katie Heinrich, Kelly Wu, Kenneth Meijer, Laura Richards, Lauren Jutlah, Le Tong, Lee Bridgeman, Leo Banet, Leonard Mbiyu, Lucy Sefton, Margaret de Chanaleilles, Maria Charisi, Matthew Beerse, Matthew J. Major, Maya Caon, Mel Bargh, Michael Rowley, Miguel Vaca Moran, Nicholas Croker, Nicolas C. Hanen, Nicole Montague, Noel E. Brick, Oliver R. Runswick, Paul Willems, Pedro Pérez-Soriano, Rebecca Blake, Rebecca Jones, Rebecca Louise Quinn, Roberto Sanchis-Sanchis, Rodrigo Rabello, Roisin Bolger, Roy Shohat, Sadie Cotton, Samantha Chua, Samuel Norwood, Samuel Vimeau, Sandro Dias, Sissel Pedersen, Spencer S. Skaper, Taylor Coyle, Terun Desai, Thomas I. Gee, Tobias Edwards, Torsten Pohl, Vanessa Yingling, Vinicius Ribeiro, Youri Duchene, Zacharias Papadakis: data collection, drafting of preregistration, replication reports and review of final manuscript.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Popper K. The logic of scientific discovery. Classics S. London: Routledge; 1959.
    1. Shrout PE, Rodgers JL. Psychology, science, and knowledge construction: broadening perspectives from the replication crisis. Annu Rev Psychol. 2018;69:487–510. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Begley CG, Ioannidis JPA. Reproducibility in science: improving the standard for basic and preclinical research. Circ Res. 2015;116:116–26. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303819 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nosek BA, Spies JR, Motyl M. Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012;7:615–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1745691612459058 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Chambers CD, Feredoes E, Muthukumaraswamy SD, Etchells PJ. Instead of ‘playing the game’ it is time to change the rules: registered reports at AIMS Neuroscience and beyond. AIMS Neurosci. 2014;1:4–17. https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2014.1.4 . - DOI

LinkOut - more resources