Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Oct;55(10):2365-2374.
doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02200-x. Epub 2025 Jun 16.

Reflections on Conducting a Large Replication Project in Sports and Exercise Science

Affiliations
Review

Reflections on Conducting a Large Replication Project in Sports and Exercise Science

Jennifer Murphy et al. Sports Med. 2025 Oct.

Abstract

This review reflects on the lessons and limitations of the first large, collaborative replication project in sports and exercise science. We discuss the challenges and barriers faced, while also exploring the broader contribution of replication to the field. This project faced many practical challenges when preparing studies for replication, specifically the poor reporting of statistical information, the availability of original raw data and the prioritisation of feasibility at the risk of some bias. However, we believe these issues reflect the larger sports and exercise science field. Therefore, our research culture needs to change to minimise the active engagement in behaviours that reduce reproducibility and replicability, and enable collective evaluation of research in line with the foundations of scientific rigour. In addition, discourse with the original study authors was a challenging process as many were unwilling to engage and this indicates a problematic perception of replication. We also reflect on the contribution of replication to theory development in sports and exercise science so that this review can serve as a valuable resource for understanding replication and can aid future replication efforts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Funding: Open Access funding provided by the IReL Consortium. This work was supported by the Irish Research Council’s Government of Ireland Postgraduate Scholarship Programme [GOIPG/2020/1155]. Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests: Jennifer Murphy, Aaron R. Caldwell and Joe P. Warne have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article. Ethics Approval: Not applicable. Consent to Participate: Not applicable. Consent for Publication: Not applicable. Availability of Data and Material: Raw data and other supplementary materials are available at https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/SFBVA . Code Availability: The code is available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/SFBVA .

References

    1. Mesquida C, Murphy J, Lakens D, Warne J. Replication concerns in sports and exercise science: a narrative review of selected methodological issues in the field. R Soc Open Sci. 2022;9: 220946. 10.1098/rsos.220946. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murphy J, Mesquida C, Warne J. A survey on the attitudes towards and perception of reproducibility and replicability in sports and exercise science. Commun Kinesiol. 2023;1(5). 10.51224/cik.2023.53.
    1. Murphy J, Mesquida C, Caldwell AR, Earp BD, Warne JP. Proposal of a selection protocol for replication of studies in sports and exercise science. Sports Med. 2023;53:281–91. 10.1007/s40279-022-01749-1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science. 2015;349:aac4716. 10.1126/science.aac4716. - PubMed
    1. Errington TM, Mathur M, Soderberg CK, Denis A, Perfito N, Iorns E, et al. Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology. Elife. 2021;10:1–30. 10.7554/eLife.71601. - PMC - PubMed