Reflections on Conducting a Large Replication Project in Sports and Exercise Science
- PMID: 40522611
- DOI: 10.1007/s40279-025-02200-x
Reflections on Conducting a Large Replication Project in Sports and Exercise Science
Abstract
This review reflects on the lessons and limitations of the first large, collaborative replication project in sports and exercise science. We discuss the challenges and barriers faced, while also exploring the broader contribution of replication to the field. This project faced many practical challenges when preparing studies for replication, specifically the poor reporting of statistical information, the availability of original raw data and the prioritisation of feasibility at the risk of some bias. However, we believe these issues reflect the larger sports and exercise science field. Therefore, our research culture needs to change to minimise the active engagement in behaviours that reduce reproducibility and replicability, and enable collective evaluation of research in line with the foundations of scientific rigour. In addition, discourse with the original study authors was a challenging process as many were unwilling to engage and this indicates a problematic perception of replication. We also reflect on the contribution of replication to theory development in sports and exercise science so that this review can serve as a valuable resource for understanding replication and can aid future replication efforts.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Funding: Open Access funding provided by the IReL Consortium. This work was supported by the Irish Research Council’s Government of Ireland Postgraduate Scholarship Programme [GOIPG/2020/1155]. Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests: Jennifer Murphy, Aaron R. Caldwell and Joe P. Warne have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article. Ethics Approval: Not applicable. Consent to Participate: Not applicable. Consent for Publication: Not applicable. Availability of Data and Material: Raw data and other supplementary materials are available at https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/SFBVA . Code Availability: The code is available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/SFBVA .
Similar articles
-
Proposal of a Selection Protocol for Replication of Studies in Sports and Exercise Science.Sports Med. 2023 Jan;53(1):281-291. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01749-1. Epub 2022 Sep 6. Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 36066754 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating the Replicability of Sports and Exercise Science Research.Sports Med. 2025 Jun 16. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02201-w. Online ahead of print. Sports Med. 2025. PMID: 40522610
-
Replication concerns in sports and exercise science: a narrative review of selected methodological issues in the field.R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Dec 14;9(12):220946. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220946. eCollection 2022 Dec. R Soc Open Sci. 2022. PMID: 36533197 Free PMC article.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Strengthening the Practice of Exercise and Sport-Science Research.Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018 Feb 1;13(2):127-134. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0322. Epub 2018 Feb 13. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018. PMID: 28787228 Review.
References
-
- Mesquida C, Murphy J, Lakens D, Warne J. Replication concerns in sports and exercise science: a narrative review of selected methodological issues in the field. R Soc Open Sci. 2022;9: 220946. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220946 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Murphy J, Mesquida C, Warne J. A survey on the attitudes towards and perception of reproducibility and replicability in sports and exercise science. Commun Kinesiol. 2023;1(5). https://doi.org/10.51224/cik.2023.53 .
-
- Murphy J, Mesquida C, Caldwell AR, Earp BD, Warne JP. Proposal of a selection protocol for replication of studies in sports and exercise science. Sports Med. 2023;53:281–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01749-1 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science. 2015;349:aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716 .
-
- Errington TM, Mathur M, Soderberg CK, Denis A, Perfito N, Iorns E, et al. Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology. Elife. 2021;10:1–30. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71601 . - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources