Technology Integration to Support Nurses in an "Inpatient Room of the Future": Qualitative Analysis
- PMID: 40522717
- PMCID: PMC12209724
- DOI: 10.2196/68689
Technology Integration to Support Nurses in an "Inpatient Room of the Future": Qualitative Analysis
Abstract
Background: The design and integration of technology within inpatient hospital rooms has a critical role in supporting nursing workflows, enhancing provider experience, and improving patient care. As health care technology evolves, there is a need to design "future-proofed" physical environments that integrate technology in ways that support workflows and maintain clinical performance. Assessing how current technologies affect nursing workflows can help inform the development of these future environments.
Objective: We assessed the current challenges nursing staff face in inpatient rooms, gather insights on technology, and build environment interactions to envision the design of a technology-integrated "Inpatient Room of the Future."
Methods: A qualitative study was conducted involving semistructured interviews, shadowing, and focus groups among nursing staff in the inpatient setting. Methods including horizon scanning, scenario analysis, technology assessment, and backcasting facilitated a comprehensive qualitative analysis of current technology use and needs in inpatient nursing workflows to inform exploratory design considerations for technology-integrated envisioned futures solutions.
Results: In total, 26 nursing staff across 4 inpatient hospital units participated in this study. Analysis identified four major themes considered central to designing a technology-integrated inpatient room that enhances nursing workflow and experience: (1) the need for seamless integration of technologies advocating for a unified system that minimizes fragmented technology use and enhances efficiency; (2) the potential for technology to reduce cognitive load, alleviate mental strain, and streamline complex workflows; (3) a focus on enhancing interpersonal communication with specific emphasis on tools that facilitate clear and efficient communication among clinicians and with patients; and (4) the importance of improved staff well-being with design considerations aimed at promoting both physical and mental health for health care workers in the inpatient setting. Envisioned future solutions included enhanced patient monitoring with automated measurements and actions through computer vision and data triangulation, a smart electronic health record-integrated supply management system using computer vision to detect supply shortages and auto-delivery of needed supplies, and a personal tech smart assistant capable of real-time patient monitoring and escalation, task prioritization, and hands-free clinical documentation and communication.
Conclusions: While current technologies address specific tasks, there are significant opportunities for better technology integration, reducing cognitive load, enhancing communication, and promoting the physical and mental well-being of nursing staff. Future research should focus on seamless technology integration aligned with clinical workflows and implementing supportive technologies that do not interfere with clinician judgment and critical thinking. Policy recommendations include oversight mechanisms for evaluating artificial intelligence-enabled devices, safeguarding patient information, and ensuring nurses are actively involved at every stage of technology development and implementation. Future inpatient unit designs should actively engage input from both nursing professionals and technologists in developing future-proofed clinical spaces to ensure the creation of integrated systems that foster a cohesive and harmonious user experience.
Keywords: built environment; digital health; health information technology; human-centered design; nursing clinical workflows; patient room design; technology integration; user-centered design.
©Elizabeth R Stevens, Veronica Alfaro Arias, Son Luu, Katharine Lawrence, Lisa Groom. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 16.06.2025.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27532314
-
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029. Online ahead of print. J Health Organ Manag. 2025. PMID: 40574247
-
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27699783 Free PMC article.
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
-
Examining How Technology Supports Shared Decision-Making in Oncology Consultations: Qualitative Thematic Analysis.JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jun 11;11:e70827. doi: 10.2196/70827. JMIR Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40499161 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Molin J, Strömbäck M, Lundström M, Lindgren B. It's not just in the walls: patient and staff experiences of a new spatial design for psychiatric inpatient care. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2021;42(12):1114–1122. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2021.1931585. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01612840.2021.1931585?url_ve... - DOI - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials