Factors influencing the participation of surrogate decision-makers for advanced cancer patients in advance care planning: A cross-sectional study
- PMID: 40522923
- PMCID: PMC12169540
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325551
Factors influencing the participation of surrogate decision-makers for advanced cancer patients in advance care planning: A cross-sectional study
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to explore the factors influencing surrogate decision-makers (SDMs) engagement in Advance Care Planning (ACP).
Design: A cross-sectional Study.
Method: A total of 285 SDMs of advanced cancer patients were recruited using convenience sampling methods. All eligible participants completed the structured questionnaires. Univariate and correlation analyses were used to explore the relationship between different variables and the ACP engagement of SDMs. Factors significant previously in univariate or correlation analyses were included in the multiple linear regression analyses with P < 0.05.
Results: Eight factors in univariate analyses and three factors in correlation analyses with P < 0.05 were taken into multiple linear regression analyses. Finally, seven variables revealed a statistically significant association with ACP engagement of SDMs and were included in the multiple linear regression model.
Conclusion: This cross-sectional study demonstrated that multiple factors, including experiences of medical decision-making, education level, knowledge of ACP, treatment expenditure, uncertainty of disease, social support, and life orientation, significantly impacted the engagement of SDMs in ACP.
Impact: Based on this study, we have identified some factors influencing the ACP engagement of SDMs, which might provide basic information for construction of the educational scheme of ACP in mainland China and help to improve SDMs' engagement in clinical ACP practice in the future.
Patient or public contribution: SDMs of advanced cancer patients participated in this study, and assisted in assessing the validation of the measurements.
Copyright: © 2025 Han et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Adaptation and Preliminary Validation of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey for Surrogate Decision Makers.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 May;57(5):980-988.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Jan 24. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019. PMID: 30684633 Free PMC article.
-
Association Between Current Medical Decision-Making Participation Self-Efficacy and Advance Care Planning Engagement Among Older Adults: Baseline Findings from a Nationwide Longitudinal Cohort Study.J Palliat Med. 2025 Jan;28(1):50-58. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2024.0106. Epub 2024 Dec 5. J Palliat Med. 2025. PMID: 39636682
-
Measuring engagement in advance care planning: a cross-sectional multicentre feasibility study.BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 23;6(6):e010375. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010375. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 27338877 Free PMC article.
-
Advance care planning for adults with heart failure.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 27;2(2):CD013022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013022.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32104908 Free PMC article.
-
Factors influencing the engagement of cancer patients with advance care planning: A scoping review.Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 May;28(3):e13091. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13091. Epub 2019 May 9. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019. PMID: 31074187
References
-
- Rietjens JAC, Sudore RL, Connolly M, van Delden JJ, Drickamer MA, Droger M, et al. Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(9):e543–51. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30582-X - DOI - PubMed
-
- Porcar Rodado E, Peral Sanchez D, Gisbert Grifo M. Advance Directives. Comparison of current legislation within the European Union. Spanish J Legal Med. 2021;47(2):66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.remle.2020.05.011 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical