Willingness to Use and Pay for Telemedicine and Teleconsultation Across Five Clinical Domains in South Korea: Cross-Sectional Survey
- PMID: 40523273
- PMCID: PMC12209718
- DOI: 10.2196/65304
Willingness to Use and Pay for Telemedicine and Teleconsultation Across Five Clinical Domains in South Korea: Cross-Sectional Survey
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated global telehealth adoption, prompting the South Korean government to temporarily legalize telemedicine in 2020 and subsequently launch a pilot program in 2023. As South Korea transitions to a postpandemic digital health environment, understanding the factors associated with willingness to use (WTU) and willingness to pay (WTP) for telemedicine and teleconsultation is essential for informing effective policy and service design. However, few studies have explored how preferences vary across clinical domains or user groups.
Objective: This study examined the factors that influence WTU and WTP for telemedicine and teleconsultation across 5 clinical domains: dermatological, psychiatric, musculoskeletal, internal medicine, and cancer disorders.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 552 participants aged 19-69 years in South Korea, selected through stratified sampling. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine WTU and WTP, considering sociodemographic factors and previous telemedicine experience.
Results: Participants' age, residence, and previous telemedicine experience significantly influenced their WTU and WTP for telemedicine services. WTP increased with age for both telemedicine (P-for-trend=.02) and teleconsultation (P-for-trend=.001). Noncapital residents showed significantly higher WTU for teleconsultation than capital area residents (odds ratio [OR] 1.48, 90% CI 1.03-2.12; P=.07). Participants with previous telemedicine experience showed higher WTU for telemedicine (OR 4.07, 90% CI 1.84-9.04; P=.004) and teleconsultation (OR 2.21, 90% CI 1.21-4.06; P=.03), and higher WTP for telemedicine (OR 2.89, 90% CI 1.84-4.54; P<.001) and teleconsultation (OR 2.76, 90% CI 1.77-4.30; P<.001). WTU and WTP varied by clinical domain: psychiatric care showed the highest WTU (64.5%) and WTP (27.0%) for telemedicine, while cancer disorders showed higher WTU (48.6%) and WTP (24.8%) for teleconsultation than for telemedicine.
Conclusions: WTU and WTP for telemedicine and teleconsultation differ substantially depending on service type, clinical domain, and user characteristics. These findings highlight the importance of considering prior telemedicine experience, regional access disparities, and condition-specific care needs when designing digital health strategies. Accordingly, flexible, user-centered telehealth policies are needed to support service accessibility and equitable implementation in the post-COVID-19 era. The insights from this study can serve as a practical foundation for developing inclusive digital health systems in countries undergoing similar transitions.
Keywords: digital health; health technology; patient preferences; telehealth.
©Hajae Jeon, Jeahyung Lee, Jieun Jang, Mingee Choi, Junbok Lee, Jaeyong Shin. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 16.06.2025.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None reported.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Identification of Motivational Determinants for Telemedicine Use Among Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Germany: Secondary Analysis of Data From a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 19;26:e47733. doi: 10.2196/47733. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 39159448 Free PMC article.
-
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May;13(22):1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025. PMID: 40417997 Review.
-
Disparities in Internet Medical Service Utilization Among Patients in Post-COVID-19 China: Cross-Sectional Study of Data From Provincial Field and National Online Surveys.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 1;27:e60546. doi: 10.2196/60546. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40749207 Free PMC article.
-
Perception and Acceptance of Telemedicine Use in Health Care Among the General Public in China: Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 16;26:e53497. doi: 10.2196/53497. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 39012687 Free PMC article.
-
Consumers' Willingness to Pay for eHealth and Its Influencing Factors: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 14;24(9):e25959. doi: 10.2196/25959. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 36103227 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kruse CS, Lee K, Watson JB, Lobo LG, Stoppelmoor AG, Oyibo SE. Measures of effectiveness, efficiency, and quality of telemedicine in the management of alcohol abuse, addiction, and rehabilitation: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(1):e13252. doi: 10.2196/13252. https://www.jmir.org/2020/1/e13252/ v22i1e13252 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Gustke SS, Balch DC, West VL, Rogers LO. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine. Telemedicine Journal. 2000;6(1):5–13. doi: 10.1089/107830200311806. - DOI
-
- Omboni S, Padwal RS, Alessa T, Benczúr B, Green BB, Hubbard I, Kario K, Khan NA, Konradi A, Logan AG, Lu Y, Mars M, McManus RJ, Melville S, Neumann CL, Parati G, Renna NF, Ryvlin P, Saner H, Schutte AE, Wang J. The worldwide impact of telemedicine during COVID-19: current evidence and recommendations for the future. Connect Health. 2022;1:7–35. doi: 10.20517/ch.2021.03. https://boris.unibe.ch/id/eprint/166317 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials