Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 14;16(8):100464.
doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100464. Online ahead of print.

Perspective: Implications of Docosahexaenoic Acid and Eicosapentaenoic Acid Supplementation on the Immune System during Cancer Chemotherapy: Perspectives from Current Clinical Evidence

Affiliations

Perspective: Implications of Docosahexaenoic Acid and Eicosapentaenoic Acid Supplementation on the Immune System during Cancer Chemotherapy: Perspectives from Current Clinical Evidence

Jaqueline Munhoz et al. Adv Nutr. .

Abstract

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) are omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 LCPUFAs) with pleiotropic effects on the immune system. Although several preclinical studies support their potential to enhance cancer treatment efficacy, this has not yet been translated into clinical studies. Currently, there are no official recommendations for n-3 LCPUFAs supplementation during cancer chemotherapy. This review examined human studies that supplemented DHA and/or EPA in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, aiming to evaluate n-3 LCPUFAs effects on immune outcomes. A systematic search was conducted using electronic databases, including OvidMedline and the Global Organization for EPA and DHA Omega-3s Clinical Study Database. Twelve studies were included in this review. EPA+DHA doses ranged from 0.6 to 4 g/d, and intervention durations ranged from 6 wk to 6 mo. Most of the studies demonstrated changes in some immune-related outcomes, including reductions in the blood markers of inflammation (interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein), a lower incidence of adverse events, and the preservation of immune cell concentrations and functions (phagocytosis and hydrogen peroxide production). However, caution is warranted due to the limited number of studies and the heterogeneity of study designs. This review discusses the limitations of current studies and the mechanistic evidence supporting the investigation and potential use of n-3 LCPUFAs during cancer chemotherapy. Future research should focus on addressing these limitations by conducting well-designed, large-scale clinical trials that clearly report the dose and duration of n-3 LCPUFAs supplementation during specific chemotherapy regimens. Despite some promising outcomes, more evidence will be needed before recommending n-3 LCPUFAs supplementation as part of chemotherapy regimens aimed at attenuating chemotherapy-induced immune alterations.

Keywords: chemotherapy; dietary supplements; docosahexaenoic acid; eicosapentaenoic acid; immune function; inflammation; omega-3 fatty acids.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest CJF is an Editorial Board Member of the Advances in Nutrition and played no role in the Journal’s evaluation of the manuscript. All other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Summary of the current evidence from studies on the beneficial effects of n-3 long-chain PUFAs supplementation on immune and hematologic outcomes during cancer chemotherapy. The data for this figure are derived from the studies described in Table 1. (A) Findings summarized by cancer type. (B) Findings summarized by immune-related and hematologic outcomes. CRP, C-reactive protein; PMN, polymorphonuclear. Created in BioRender. Munhoz, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/59hmnq9
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Proposed model of study components for higher-quality evidence. The initial steps involve the study design and include sample size calculation, definition of the study protocol based on existing literature, assessment of confounding factors and compliance, and evaluation of multiple timepoints. Ideally, studies aimed at evaluating immune outcomes should expand their methods to include inflammatory markers, cellular immunity, and functional assays, and integrate these with mechanisms and clinical outcomes. Lastly, studies should report findings based on robust statistical analyses and follow established guidelines (for example, CONSORT checklist) for clear and transparent reporting. Together, these steps have the potential to enhance reproducibility and consistency across studies and facilitate the translation of findings into treatment recommendations. IFN-γ, interferon gamma; TGF-β, transforming growth factor beta. Created in BioRender. Munhoz, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/z47qrdk

Similar articles

References

    1. Bray F., Laversanne M., Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Soerjomataram I., et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2024;74(3):229–263. - PubMed
    1. Society A.C. American Cancer Society (ACS); Atlanta: 2024. Cancer Facts & Figures 2024.
    1. Aboud K., Meissner M., Ocen J., Jones R. Cytotoxic chemotherapy: clinical aspects. Medicine. 2023;51(1):23–27.
    1. Livshits Z., Rao R.B., Smith S.W. An approach to chemotherapy-associated toxicity. Emerg. Med. Clin. North Am. 2014;32(1):167–203. - PubMed
    1. Dunn G.P., Bruce A.T., Ikeda H., Old L.J., Schreiber R.D. Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape. Nat. Immunol. 2002;3(11):991–998. - PubMed