Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Dec;21(1):2518641.
doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2518641. Epub 2025 Jun 17.

Innovative micro physiological systems for vaccine development

Affiliations
Review

Innovative micro physiological systems for vaccine development

Kendra Reynaud et al. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec.

Abstract

Micro Physiological systems (MPS) are biomimetic platforms that reconstitute the complex architecture of human organs and tissues in vitro. MPSs have the capacity to improve clinical development pipelines as they address certain translational limitations that exist in other pre-clinical models by providing human-relevant microenvironments. These platforms have already demonstrated their potential in vaccine development, as several variations of MPSs have recently been published that provided results relevant to vaccine trials in humans. Previous MPSs include approximations of peripheral and lymphoid tissue in static platforms to study the innate and adaptive response to vaccination, as well as a lymphoid-follicle-on-chip under dynamic flow which produces antigen-specific antibodies to vaccination. Up-and-coming devices could be used to study the interplay between vaccine reactogenicity and innate immune stimulation, and thereby derisk vaccine targets by elucidating their inflammatory profiles prior to advancement to clinical trials.

Keywords: Micro physiological systems; biomimetic; immunogenicity; in vitro; pre-clinical; reactogenicity; translational; vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The advantages and disadvantages of current preclinical models.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
An MPS with muscle fibers and a dynamic, endothelial-cell-lined blood flow compartment that recapitulates the innate immune response to vaccination: (1) the vaccine is introduced to the skeletal muscle compartment, (2) inflammatory mediators diffuse across the ECM into the blood compartment where they (3) stimulate the endothelial and immune cells and induce immune cell migration across the endothelial barrier.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
A publicly available database of molecular biomarkers and clinical symptoms produced in humans after vaccination could be used in an iterative process to improve vaccine testing in vitro. in silico predictions of reactogenicity from in vitro data could be validated with the database and used to improve candidates before advancement to clinical trials, thereby derisking the pipeline and reducing costs overall.

References

    1. Srivastava SK, Foo GW, Aggarwal N, Chang MW.. Organ-on-chip technology: opportunities and challenges. Biotechnol Notes. 2024;5:8–11. doi: 10.1016/j.biotno.2024.01.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhatia SN, Ingber DE. Microfluidic organs-on-chips. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(8):760–772. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2989. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morrocchi E, van Haren S, Palma P, Levy O. Modeling human immune responses to vaccination in vitro. Trends Immunol. 2024;45(1):32–47. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2023.11.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Duval K, Grover H, Han L-H, Mou Y, Pegoraro AF, Fredberg J, Chen Z. Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture. Physiol Bethesda Md. 2017;32(4):266–277. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00036.2016. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collins FS. Reengineering translational science: the time is right. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3(90):90cm17. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002747. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources