Perceptions, availability and use of vasopressors for septic shock in emergency care settings in Tanzania
- PMID: 40524939
- PMCID: PMC12167811
- DOI: 10.1016/j.afjem.2025.05.003
Perceptions, availability and use of vasopressors for septic shock in emergency care settings in Tanzania
Abstract
Background: Sepsis carries a disproportionately high mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa. Current international guidelines for management of septic shock advocate for initial fluid resuscitation followed by vasopressors if there is ongoing concern for hypoperfusion. Emerging data suggest patients in sub-Saharan Africa who receives large fluid boluses may have increased mortality and thus earlier initiation of vasopressors may have clinical benefit. Little data exists on the perceptions, availability and use of vasopressors in Tanzania, which may impact the feasibility of this strategy. We aimed to describe the perception, availability and use of vasopressor in Tanzanian emergency care settings, including its barriers.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey among clinicians and nurses from 19 different hospitals throughout Tanzania (national, zonal, regional and district hospitals). Collected data was kept by the principal investigator on a password encrypted computer whereby descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results.
Results: Sixty-five healthcare providers completed the survey of whom the majority 53 (81.5 %), work in the emergency medicine department and 50 (76.9 %) reported treating at least one patient with septic shock per week. However, three quarters of respondents from district hospitals and nearly half of those from regional hospitals had access to vasopressors in <50 % of the time. The most common reported barriers to vasopressor use were lack of availability (50.8 %), and lack of comfort or knowledge (43.1 %). Overall, most respondents perceived that vasopressor use is generally safe and helpful for treating septic shock.
Conclusions: Nearly all Tanzanian healthcare providers in emergency care settings reported that they had limited access to vasopressors to treat septic shock, as it was not consistently available. In addition to unavailability, lack of knowledge on vasopressor use was also reported as barrier. Our findings suggest that ensuring availability of vasopressors and education in the use thereof would improve sepsis care in Tanzanian hospitals.
Keywords: Emergency care; Tanzania; Vasopressors.
© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of African Federation for Emergency Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019. Qatar Med J. 2019. PMID: 31763206 Free PMC article.
-
Current use of vasopressors in septic shock.Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Jan 30;9(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0498-7. Ann Intensive Care. 2019. PMID: 30701448 Free PMC article.
-
Haemodynamic assessment and support in sepsis and septic shock in resource-limited settings.Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Nov 1;111(11):483-489. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/try007. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2017. PMID: 29438568 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prescribing patterns of hydrocortisone in septic shock: a single-center experience of how surviving sepsis guidelines are interpreted and translated into bedside practice.Crit Care Med. 2013 Oct;41(10):2310-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828cef29. Crit Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23787398
-
Fluids or vasopressors for the initial resuscitation of septic shock.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 24;9:1069782. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1069782. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36507525 Free PMC article. Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources