Factors Associated With Self-Rated Health Among Older Adults in Japan: A Decision Tree Analysis
- PMID: 40524995
- PMCID: PMC12168621
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.84245
Factors Associated With Self-Rated Health Among Older Adults in Japan: A Decision Tree Analysis
Abstract
Background Self-rated health (SRH) is a widely used single-item measure that predicts morbidity, mortality, and healthcare use. In aging societies, such as Japan, SRH serves as a vital public health indicator. Although many factors influence SRH, their relative importance and interactions remain unclear, particularly among older adults. Prior studies have mostly used linear models, which are limited in their ability to capture interactions and non-linear relationships. Such complexities are often present in multifactorial outcomes such as SRH. This study aimed to identify the key determinants of SRH using decision tree analysis in a large sample of community-dwelling older adults in Japan to inform targeted strategies for promoting healthy aging. Method We analyzed cross-sectional data from 1,821 older adults in Ayase City, Japan, corresponding to a response rate of 62.1% from 3,058 individuals invited by mail. SRH was dichotomized into high and low categories. Missing data were addressed using multiple imputations. Decision tree analysis using the classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm identified the key determinants of SRH, focusing on modifiable factors. The predictors included age, sex, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) score, Motor Fitness Scale (MFS) score, instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) assessed by the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index of Competence (TMIG-IC), and the frequency of going out and exercising. The model performance was evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation. Results Among the 1,821 older adults, 73.5% were classified as belonging to the high SRH group. Higher MFS scores, lower GDS scores, greater TMIG-IC scores, and more frequent going out and exercise were significantly associated with a high SRH (all p < 0.001). Decision tree analysis identified MFS as the most important discriminator, followed by GDS and activity frequency. The model achieved an accuracy of 80.3%, with a specificity of 90.8% and a sensitivity of 51.5%. Conclusions Using decision tree analysis, this study identified MFS, GDS, and TMIG-IC as key determinants of SRH among older adults in Japan. These modifiable factors, including physical function, mental health, and daily competence, offer actionable targets for health promotion. The model's ability to stratify SRH based on practical variables supports its use in guiding individualized and population-level strategies. These findings highlight the importance of addressing motor fitness, depressive symptoms, and functional autonomy through community-based exercise programs, mental health screening, and IADL-enhancing services, in order to improve perceived health and quality of life in aging populations. However, due to its modest sensitivity, the model may be less effective in detecting individuals with low SRH and should be used alongside other screening tools when applied in population health settings.
Keywords: decision tree analysis; depressive symptoms; japanese older adults; physical activity; self-rated health.
Copyright © 2025, Shibahashi et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. The Ethics Committee of J. F. Oberlin University issued approval 17007. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Self-rated health predicts decline in instrumental activities of daily living among high-functioning community-dwelling older people.Age Ageing. 2017 Mar 1;46(2):265-270. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw164. Age Ageing. 2017. PMID: 27614076
-
Instrumental activities of daily living and self-rated health in community-dwelling older adults: cross-sectional findings from the HUNT Study (HUNT4 Trondheim 70+).BMC Geriatr. 2025 May 14;25(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05983-w. BMC Geriatr. 2025. PMID: 40369403 Free PMC article.
-
Self-rated health is associated with subsequent functional decline among older adults in Japan.Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Sep;29(9):1475-1483. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217000692. Epub 2017 May 31. Int Psychogeriatr. 2017. PMID: 28560936
-
Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: An Evidence Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2020 Feb. Report No.: 19-05257-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2020 Feb. Report No.: 19-05257-EF-1. PMID: 32129963 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. Idler EL, Benyamini Y. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2955359. J Health Soc Behav. 1997;38:21–37. - PubMed
-
- Self-reported health and adult mortality risk: an analysis of cause-specific mortality. Benjamins MR, Hummer RA, Eberstein IW, Nam CB. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:1297–1306. - PubMed
-
- Aspirations for older age in the 21st century: what is successful aging? Bowling A. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2007;64:263–297. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources