Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 3:55:101337.
doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101337. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Early and long-term effects of prophylactic and post-excision human papillomavirus vaccination on recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia relative to margin status: a retrospective cohort study in the Czech Republic

Affiliations

Early and long-term effects of prophylactic and post-excision human papillomavirus vaccination on recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia relative to margin status: a retrospective cohort study in the Czech Republic

Marek Petráš et al. Lancet Reg Health Eur. .

Abstract

Background: The effect of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination on cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) recurrence with respect to cone margin positivity is unknown. Most studies assessed this effect beyond two months post-conisation. We aimed to determine both the duration and early onset of effect in women who had been prophylactically vaccinated or vaccinated after conisation, considering cone margin status.

Methods: This cohort study used data from one of the central laboratories in the Czech Republic, covering approximately 33% of women undergoing national cervical cancer screening. It included women treated for CIN2+ between 2010 and 2024 who had received either prophylactic HPV vaccination (available through the national immunisation program since 2011) or post-conisation vaccination (recommended by the Czech Gynaecological and Obstetrical Society since 2008). The vaccination effect was estimated using the incidence rate ratio (IRR) from a Poisson regression model, calculated as 100 × (1-IRR).

Findings: Of the 10,054 women enrolled, 919 were vaccinated after conisation, 502 prophylactically, and 169 had undetermined timing of vaccination. Throughout the follow-up period, CIN2+ recurrence was observed in 513 unvaccinated women, with a rate of 14·61 per 1000 person-years (py), in 14 prophylactically vaccinated women, with a rate of 5·84 (54% reduction; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 22-73%), and in 15 women vaccinated post-excision, with a rate of 3·37 (74% reduction; 95% CI: 57-85%). The high recurrence rate of 58·59 per 1000 py within six months of conisation was reduced by 80% (95% CI: 19-95%) with prophylactic vaccination and by 89% (95% CI: 57-97%) with incomplete post-excision vaccination. Among a total of 1771 women with a positive cone margin, recurrence was identified in 272 of 1568 unvaccinated women, corresponding to a recurrence rate of 51·62 per 1000 py. A reduction was observed in 84 prophylactically vaccinated and in 119 women vaccinated post-excision, with only 6 recurrence cases documented in each group. This corresponded to recurrence rates of 14·94 (62% reduction; 95% CI: 14-83%) and 9·78 per 1000 py (79% reduction; 95% CI: 52-90%), respectively.

Interpretation: Regardless of timing, HPV vaccination has a beneficial long-term effect in lowering the risk of CIN2+ recurrence. Despite the greater reduction in relapse achieved by post-excision vaccination, the difference compared with the prophylactic one was not statistically significant. The most pronounced benefit was observed within the first six months post-conisation, particularly in women with a positive cone margin.

Funding: Cooperatio 31 fund, Health Sciences, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

Keywords: Adjuvant intervention; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Conisation; Human papillomavirus; Recurrence; Vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of cohort study. CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia any grade including indeterminate dysplasia and carcinoma. CIN2+, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse and carcinoma.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Probability of recurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and carcinoma in HPV-vaccinated and unvaccinated women, relative to time since conisation: a) prophylactic and post-excision vaccination, in women regardless of cone margin status, b) regardless of vaccination timing and cone margin status, c) prophylactic and post-excision vaccination in women with positive cone margins, d) regardless of vaccination timing, in women with positive cone margins, e) prophylactic and post-excision vaccination in women with negative cone margins, f) regardless of vaccination timing in women with negative cone margins. 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

References

    1. Human papillomavirus vaccines: WHO position paper, December 2022. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-wer9750-645-672
    1. Considerations for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine product choice. 1st ed. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2024.
    1. Czech Gynecological and Obstetrical Society of the Czech Medical Association of J. E. Purkyně (ČGPS ČLS JEP) Recommendations for HPV vaccination in women treated for cervical precancerous lesions. https://www.hpvguide.eu/ockovani-konizovanych-zen?utm_source=chatgpt.com
    1. Bizzarri N., Kyrgiou M., De Vincenzo R., et al. Prophylactic HPV vaccination in HPV -related gynecologic cancers: European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO) prevention committee opinion. Intl J Gynecol Obste. 2024;169(2):597–604. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khieu M., Butler S.L. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): 2025. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion of the cervix.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430728/ - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources