Lupus anticoagulant testing in Belgian laboratories: a comparison with the 2020 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee (ISTH-SSC) guidelines
- PMID: 40525382
- DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2025.2519714
Lupus anticoagulant testing in Belgian laboratories: a comparison with the 2020 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee (ISTH-SSC) guidelines
Abstract
Objectives: We investigated lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing in Belgium and verified these findings against the 2020 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee (ISTH-SSC) Guidelines.
Methods: A survey, interrogating pre- and post-analytical aspects of antiphospholipid antibodies, including LA analysis, was distributed to all Belgian laboratories (n = 111).
Results: About 66% of the laboratories responding to the entire survey (58%) performed LA analysis. About 78% used thrombocyte-free citrated plasma. Most (90%) used the combination of dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), performing dRVVT (82%) and aPTT (78%) if the screening test was prolonged. A variety of instrument/reagent combinations were used. Normal pooled plasma (PNP) for mixing tests was used by 83%, either commercially lyophilized (56%) or frozen (44%), mostly (98%) in a 1:1 PNP: patient plasma ratio. Interpretation was based on normalized clotting time ratio, using manufacturers' or own study data as cutoff values. About 61% gave a final conclusion. About 88% added comments, mainly (94%) with a positive result. All laboratories programmed a barring period after an initial positive result. About 66% performed LA detection in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants, 74% after using sample pretreatment with active charcoal absorption. LA testing for vitamin K antagonists and heparin-treated patients was done by 54%, regardless of international normalized ratio (64%) or anti-FXa results (82%).
Conclusions: The survey shows adherence to ISTH-SSC guidelines, especially for sample preparation and test methodologies. Additional efforts are required to harmonize LA detection in anticoagulated patients and result interpretation.
Keywords: Antiphospholipid syndrome; clinical laboratory techniques; cutoff value; lupus anticoagulant.
Similar articles
-
Lupus Anticoagulant Testing for Diagnosis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Perspective Informed by Local Practice.J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 8;14(14):4812. doi: 10.3390/jcm14144812. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40725505 Free PMC article.
-
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33075160 Free PMC article.
-
Antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents for primary prevention of thrombosis in individuals with antiphospholipid antibodies.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 13;7(7):CD012534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012534.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30004572 Free PMC article.
-
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35593186 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancing Lupus Anticoagulant Testing with Machine Learning: Deep Neural Networks Match Expert Performance without the Need for Feature Selection.J Appl Lab Med. 2025 Jul 1;10(4):911-923. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfaf039. J Appl Lab Med. 2025. PMID: 40238795
Cited by
-
Antiphospholipid Syndrome-Diagnostic and Methodologic Approach.Metabolites. 2025 Jul 27;15(8):500. doi: 10.3390/metabo15080500. Metabolites. 2025. PMID: 40863119 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous