Artificial intelligence for glaucoma
- PMID: 40525544
- PMCID: PMC12172147
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD016114
Artificial intelligence for glaucoma
Abstract
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (diagnostic). The objectives are as follows: To determine the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms as a diagnostic tool for glaucoma compared with human graders in a community or secondary care setting. Secondary objectives To compare the performance of different AI algorithms in the diagnosis of glaucoma To explore other potential causes of heterogeneity in the diagnostic performance compared with human graders, using subgroup analysis of the following characteristics: Clinical setting in which the test is used (the general population in the community versus people referred to secondary care); Study design (studies enroling consecutive participants in the same setting versus multicentre registries and public databases); Characteristics of the population (age according to quartiles, sex, symptomatic versus asymptomatic), when sufficient data are available; Prevalence of glaucoma in the training and test sets (< 5% versus ≥ 5%), since sensitivity and specificity may depend on disease prevalence [17]; Severity of glaucoma; Core AI method used (neural networks, random forests, support vector machines, or others); Size of the dataset from which performance data were collected (< 1000 versus ≥ 1000 total unique participants); Modalities of input data for the AI algorithms (imaging data, visual fields, clinical parameters, or any combination), particularly as their accessibility and affordability may vary across different settings.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration.
Conflict of interest statement
KV: none
RG: none
AS: none
MM: received payment from SIFI (ophthalmic company) to attend meetings
SMN: reports a grant from the National Eye Institute (UG1EY020522), National Institutes of Health, USA; payment to the institution
AA: none. AA is a Cochrane Editor, but was not involved in the editorial process for this protocol.
SL: reports a grant from the National Eye Institute (UG1EY020522), National Institutes of Health, USA; payment to the institution. SL is a Cochrane Editor, but was not involved in the editorial process for this protocol.
GV: none. GV is a Cochrane Editor, but was not involved in the editorial process for this protocol.
KH: none
Figures
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based decision support for the detection of cutaneous melanoma in primary care: a prospective real-life clinical trial.Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jun 20;191(1):125-133. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae021. Br J Dermatol. 2024. PMID: 38234043 Clinical Trial.
-
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025. PMID: 40493548 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of artificial intelligence algorithms in predicting acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jan 28;25(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02869-0. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025. PMID: 39875868 Free PMC article.
-
What makes a 'good' decision with artificial intelligence? A grounded theory study in paediatric care.BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025 May 20;30(3):183-193. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-112919. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025. PMID: 39939160 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x. Respir Res. 2024. PMID: 39709425 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- De Fauw J, Ledsam JR, Romera-Paredes B, Nikolov S, Tomasev N, Blackwell S, et al. Clinically applicable deep learning for diagnosis and referral in retinal disease. Nature Medicine 2018;24(9):1342-50. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical