Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 17;19(1):300.
doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02467-2.

Assessing the learning curve in robot-assisted intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis and transrectal extraction (NICE) procedure: from Initial Learning to Mastery

Affiliations

Assessing the learning curve in robot-assisted intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis and transrectal extraction (NICE) procedure: from Initial Learning to Mastery

Jacques Bistre-Varon et al. J Robot Surg. .

Abstract

The robotic NICE procedure is a novel minimally invasive approach in colorectal surgery, yet its learning curve remains undefined; this study aimed to define its distinct phases by analyzing operative time trends. A retrospective review of 170 consecutive NICE procedures performed by a single surgeon between May 2018 and August 2019 was undertaken. Skin-to-skin operative time was the learning curve surrogate and plotted with unadjusted and risk-adjusted cumulative sum (CUSUM) analyses. Risk adjustment incorporated age, body mass index, ASA class, sex, prior abdominal surgery, diagnosis, anastomotic level, and the need for diverting loop ileostomy-used as a marker of case complexity rather than a direct time determinant. Phase-specific peri-operative outcomes were compared non-parametrically. Five proficiency phases were identified: Initial Learning (cases 1-10), Experienced (11-65), Second Learning (66-80), Advanced Experienced (81-124) and Mastery (125-170). The unadjusted CUSUM rose to + 342 min above the cohort mean by case 10, crossed the baseline at case 55, then gradually declined and plateaued at approximately -215 min by case 170. Risk-adjusted CUSUM displayed parallel inflection points (peak + 78 min, nadir -162 min), confirming that an easier case mix did not explain efficiency gains. Mean operative time fell from 248.8 ± 64.1 min in the first phase to approximately 185 min in Mastery, and inter-quartile variability narrowed from 125 to 59 min. Intraoperative complications (overall 12.4%), blood loss, organ/space surgical site infection, and 30-day morbidity did not differ across phases (p > 0.05). The robotic NICE procedure follows a five-phase learning curve, with true proficiency-and a 20% reduction in operative time-achieved after ~ 55 cases. Safety metrics remained similar across phases, confirming that efficiency gains reflect skill acquisition rather than easier case mix. These milestones can guide training for surgeons adopting the technique.

Keywords: Colorectal surgery; Learning curve; Natural orifice intracorporeal anastomosis; Robotic surgery; Transrectal extraction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: Eric M. Haas is a consultant for Intuitive Surgical, Medtronic, and Ethicon Endosurgical outside the current work. Ethical approval and consent to participate: This study was conducted following institutional policies. IRB approval was obtained, and patient consent was not required due to the study’s retrospective nature.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hakmi H et al (2022) Improved morbidity, mortality, and cost with minimally invasive colon resection compared to open surgery. Jsls. https://doi.org/10.4293/jsls.2021.00092 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Hajirawala LN et al (2022) Minimally invasive surgery is associated with improved outcomes following urgent inpatient colectomy. Jsls. https://doi.org/10.4293/jsls.2021.00075 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Biswas P, Sikander S, Kulkarni P (2023) Recent advances in robot-assisted surgical systems. Biomed Eng Adv 6:100109 - DOI
    1. Ashrafian H et al (2017) The evolution of robotic surgery: surgical and anaesthetic aspects. Br J Anaesth 119:i72–i84 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morris B (2005) Robotic surgery: applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education. MedGenMed 7(3):72 - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources