Assessing the learning curve in robot-assisted intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis and transrectal extraction (NICE) procedure: from Initial Learning to Mastery
- PMID: 40526277
- DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02467-2
Assessing the learning curve in robot-assisted intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis and transrectal extraction (NICE) procedure: from Initial Learning to Mastery
Abstract
The robotic NICE procedure is a novel minimally invasive approach in colorectal surgery, yet its learning curve remains undefined; this study aimed to define its distinct phases by analyzing operative time trends. A retrospective review of 170 consecutive NICE procedures performed by a single surgeon between May 2018 and August 2019 was undertaken. Skin-to-skin operative time was the learning curve surrogate and plotted with unadjusted and risk-adjusted cumulative sum (CUSUM) analyses. Risk adjustment incorporated age, body mass index, ASA class, sex, prior abdominal surgery, diagnosis, anastomotic level, and the need for diverting loop ileostomy-used as a marker of case complexity rather than a direct time determinant. Phase-specific peri-operative outcomes were compared non-parametrically. Five proficiency phases were identified: Initial Learning (cases 1-10), Experienced (11-65), Second Learning (66-80), Advanced Experienced (81-124) and Mastery (125-170). The unadjusted CUSUM rose to + 342 min above the cohort mean by case 10, crossed the baseline at case 55, then gradually declined and plateaued at approximately -215 min by case 170. Risk-adjusted CUSUM displayed parallel inflection points (peak + 78 min, nadir -162 min), confirming that an easier case mix did not explain efficiency gains. Mean operative time fell from 248.8 ± 64.1 min in the first phase to approximately 185 min in Mastery, and inter-quartile variability narrowed from 125 to 59 min. Intraoperative complications (overall 12.4%), blood loss, organ/space surgical site infection, and 30-day morbidity did not differ across phases (p > 0.05). The robotic NICE procedure follows a five-phase learning curve, with true proficiency-and a 20% reduction in operative time-achieved after ~ 55 cases. Safety metrics remained similar across phases, confirming that efficiency gains reflect skill acquisition rather than easier case mix. These milestones can guide training for surgeons adopting the technique.
Keywords: Colorectal surgery; Learning curve; Natural orifice intracorporeal anastomosis; Robotic surgery; Transrectal extraction.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: Eric M. Haas is a consultant for Intuitive Surgical, Medtronic, and Ethicon Endosurgical outside the current work. Ethical approval and consent to participate: This study was conducted following institutional policies. IRB approval was obtained, and patient consent was not required due to the study’s retrospective nature.
Similar articles
-
Prior experience in laparoscopic rectal surgery can minimise the learning curve for robotic rectal resections: a cumulative sum analysis.Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4067-4076. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5453-9. Epub 2017 Mar 7. Surg Endosc. 2017. PMID: 28271267
-
Robotic right hemicolectomy: Analysis of 108 consecutive procedures and multidimensional assessment of the learning curve.Surg Oncol. 2017 Mar;26(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 19. Surg Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28317582
-
Learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery.J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):489-495. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01131-1. Epub 2020 Aug 4. J Robot Surg. 2021. PMID: 32754791
-
Surgical resection for diverticulitis using robotic natural orifice intracorporeal anastomosis and transrectal extraction approach: the NICE procedure.J Robot Surg. 2020 Jun;14(3):517-523. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01022-0. Epub 2019 Sep 10. J Robot Surg. 2020. PMID: 31506878
-
The success rate of robotic natural orifice intracorporeal anastomosis and transrectal extraction (NICE procedure) in a large cohort of consecutive unselected patients.Surg Endosc. 2023 Jan;37(1):683-691. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09717-6. Epub 2022 Nov 23. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 36418639 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comment on "Assessing the learning curve in robot-assisted intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis and transrectal extraction (NICE) procedure: from Initial Learning to Mastery".J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 1;19(1):339. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02515-x. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40588667 No abstract available.
-
Cost analysis of robot NICE procedure versus open, laparoscopic, and robotic colorectal surgery: is there an economic benefit to natural orifice resection?Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug 26. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12050-3. Online ahead of print. Surg Endosc. 2025. PMID: 40858942
References
-
- Hakmi H et al (2022) Improved morbidity, mortality, and cost with minimally invasive colon resection compared to open surgery. Jsls. https://doi.org/10.4293/jsls.2021.00092 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Hajirawala LN et al (2022) Minimally invasive surgery is associated with improved outcomes following urgent inpatient colectomy. Jsls. https://doi.org/10.4293/jsls.2021.00075 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Biswas P, Sikander S, Kulkarni P (2023) Recent advances in robot-assisted surgical systems. Biomed Eng Adv 6:100109 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources