Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 17.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11737-4. Online ahead of print.

Effects of patient and imaging factors on small bowel motility scores derived from deep learning-based segmentation of cine MRI

Affiliations

Effects of patient and imaging factors on small bowel motility scores derived from deep learning-based segmentation of cine MRI

Subin Heo et al. Eur Radiol. .

Abstract

Objectives: Small bowel motility can be quantified using cine MRI, but the influence of patient and imaging factors on motility scores remains unclear. This study evaluated whether patient and imaging factors affect motility scores derived from deep learning-based segmentation of cine MRI.

Materials and methods: Fifty-four patients (mean age 53.6 ± 16.4 years; 34 women) with chronic constipation or suspected colonic pseudo-obstruction who underwent cine MRI covering the entire small bowel between 2022 and 2023 were included. A deep learning algorithm was developed to segment small bowel regions, and motility was quantified with an optical flow-based algorithm, producing a motility score for each slice. Associations of motility scores with patient factors (age, sex, body mass index, symptoms, and bowel distension) and MRI slice-related factors (anatomical location, bowel area, and anteroposterior position) were analyzed using linear mixed models.

Results: Deep learning-based small bowel segmentation achieved a mean volumetric Dice similarity coefficient of 75.4 ± 18.9%, with a manual correction time of 26.5 ± 13.5 s. Median motility scores per patient ranged from 26.4 to 64.4, with an interquartile range of 3.1-26.6. Multivariable analysis revealed that MRI slice-related factors, including anatomical location with mixed ileum and jejunum (β = -4.9; p = 0.01, compared with ileum dominant), bowel area (first order β = -0.2, p < 0.001; second order β = 5.7 × 10-4, p < 0.001), and anteroposterior position (first order β = -51.5, p < 0.001; second order β = 28.8, p = 0.004) were significantly associated with motility scores. Patient factors showed no association with motility scores.

Conclusion: Small bowel motility scores were significantly associated with MRI slice-related factors. Determining global motility without adjusting for these factors may be limited.

Key points: Question Global small bowel motility can be quantified from cine MRI; however, the confounding factors affecting motility scores remain unclear. Findings Motility scores were significantly influenced by MRI slice-related factors, including anatomical location, bowel area, and anteroposterior position. Clinical relevance Adjusting for slice-related factors is essential for accurate interpretation of small bowel motility scores on cine MRI.

Keywords: Confounding factors; Constipation; Deep learning; Gastrointestinal motility; Magnetic resonance imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethical standards. Guarantor: The scientific guarantor of this publication is Dong Wook Kim. Conflict of interest: The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. Statistics and biometry: Seo Young Park kindly provided statistical advice for this manuscript. Informed consent: Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board. Ethical approval: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Study subjects or cohorts overlap: None. Methodology: Retrospective Cross-sectional study Performed at one institution

Similar articles

References

    1. Keller J, Layer P (2009) Intestinal and anorectal motility and functional disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 23:407–423 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lindberg G, Tornblom H, Iwarzon M, Nyberg B, Martin JE, Veress B (2009) Full-thickness biopsy findings in chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction and enteric dysmotility. Gut 58:1084–1090 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Menys A, Taylor SA, Emmanuel A et al (2013) Global small bowel motility: assessment with dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 269:443–450 - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Jonge CS, Smout A, Nederveen AJ, Stoker J (2018) Evaluation of gastrointestinal motility with MRI: advances, challenges and opportunities. Neurogastroenterol Motil 30:e13257 - DOI
    1. Choi JY, Yun J, Heo S et al (2023) Technical feasibility of quantitative measurement of various degrees of small bowel motility using cine magnetic resonance imaging. Korean J Radiol 24:1093–1101 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources