Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Jul;57(7):508-512.
doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2025.362243. Epub 2025 Jun 16.

An Exploration of Feedback Using Hattie and Timperley's Feedback Levels

Kelsey Compagna  1 , Shelley Ross  1 , Ann Lee  1
Affiliations
Observational Study

An Exploration of Feedback Using Hattie and Timperley's Feedback Levels

Kelsey Compagna et al. Fam Med. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Effective feedback is recognized as essential to clinical training. Hattie and Timperley conducted a comprehensive review of feedback to develop their Model of Feedback to Enhance Learning (MFEL). The MFEL proposes that effective feedback can focus on any of four levels: task, process, self-regulation, and self. While Hattie and Timperley are frequently cited for their review, few studies in medical education have used the MFEL to explore feedback. We used the MFEL to examine the content of documented workplace-based feedback to explore how this model applies in a family medicine residency program.

Methods: We conducted this retrospective cross-sectional observational secondary data analysis (learning analytics) study in a Canadian university-based family medicine residency program. Our data source was de-identified field notes (a tool to document workplace-based feedback) for residents at two teaching sites. We coded the feedback using the levels from the MFEL. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the frequencies of each level and combinations of levels.

Results: Of the 2,250 field notes examined, 422 (18%) were excluded because they contained no feedback. The majority (1,105; 60%) included a single feedback level, while 705 (38%) contained two levels, and 17 (1%) included three levels. No field notes included all four levels. Of the field notes containing one feedback level, the most common levels were task (835; 76%) and process (248; 22%). The most common combination of levels was process and task (649; 92.1%).

Conclusions: Hattie and Timperley's MFEL offers a way to explore feedback documented in medical education programs and may help programs identify opportunities for faculty development to improve feedback effectiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. FieldNotes
Figure 2
Figure 2. Proportional Distribution of Feedback Levels Coded in the Narrative on Field Notes
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cantillon P, Sargeant J. Giving feedback in clinical settings. BMJ. 2008;337:1961. - PubMed
    1. Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2007;77(1):81–112.
    1. Hodges B. Assessment in the post-psychometric era: learning to love the subjective and collective. Med Teach. 2013;35(7):564–568. - PubMed
    1. Ross S, Hauer K E, Wycliffe-Jones K. Key considerations in planning and designing programmatic assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2021;43(7):758–764. - PubMed
    1. Harris P, Bhanji F, Topps M. Evolving concepts of assessment in a competency-based world. Med Teach. 2017;39(6):603–608. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources