The Singapore/Malaysia Cross-Sectional Genetics Epidemiology Study: An Updated and Detailed Analysis of Acne Vulgaris Severity, Scarring, and Phenotypes and Their Associated Risk Factors among Young Chinese Adults
- PMID: 40527305
- PMCID: PMC12279316
- DOI: 10.1159/000547009
The Singapore/Malaysia Cross-Sectional Genetics Epidemiology Study: An Updated and Detailed Analysis of Acne Vulgaris Severity, Scarring, and Phenotypes and Their Associated Risk Factors among Young Chinese Adults
Abstract
Introduction: Despite the high prevalence of acne vulgaris and its impact on affected individuals, few studies have provided a detailed characterization of acne phenotypes and their associated risk factors. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the prevalence, severity, scarring, and phenotypes of acne, along with their associated risk factors, in a cohort of young Chinese adults, as part of the Singapore and Malaysia Cross-Sectional Genetic Epidemiology Study (SMCGES).
Methods: Participants were randomly and consecutively recruited from universities in Singapore and Malaysia. Data on sociodemographic, familial medical histories of atopic diseases and acne, and lifestyle habits were collected using a validated investigator-administered questionnaire from 6,225 young Chinese adults (mean age = 22.8 ± 5.7 years). A subset of participants underwent clinical assessment for acne severity (n = 2,345), scarring grade (n = 2,345), and phenotypes (n = 1,191) by dermatologically trained personnel.
Results: The prevalence of acne was 56.0%. Among acne cases (n = 3,504), 38.5% had moderate-to-severe acne, 52.8% had scarring, 95.7% presented with blackhead and/or whitehead, and 55.8% had inflammatory phenotypes (e.g., papules, pustules, cysts, and nodules). A parental history of acne emerged as the strongest risk factor associated with all acne phenotypes. Pet ownership (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.403, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.131-1.744, p < 0.05) and occasional alcohol consumption (AOR: 1.328, 95% CI: 1.090-1.617, p < 0.05) were associated with a higher odd for blackhead and/or whitehead. Protective factors included higher parental education levels for acne scarring (AOR: 0.650, 95% CI: 0.459-0.904; p < 0.05), male gender (AOR: 0.365, 95% CI: 0.298-0.446; p < 0.05), and birthplace (AOR: 0.674, 95% CI: 0.555-0.819; p < 0.05) for non-inflammatory phenotypes.
Conclusions: This study, conducted in a well-defined cohort of young Chinese adults from the SMCGES, reinforces familial history as a key risk factor for acne onset, severity, scarring, and phenotype manifestation. The identification of modifiable and environmental factors associated with acne phenotypes offers valuable insights for targeted interventions to improve acne management and control.
Keywords: Acne phenotypes; Acne vulgaris; Epidemiology; Ethnic chinese; Risk factors.
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Conflict of interest statement
F.T.C. reports grants from the National University of Singapore, Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund, Singapore Immunology Network, National Medical Research Council (NMRC) (Singapore), Biomedical Research Council (BMRC) (Singapore), National Research Foundation (NRF) (Singapore), Singapore Food Agency (SFA), Singapore’s Economic Development Board (EDB), and the Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*STAR) (Singapore), during the conduct of the study; and consulting fees from Sime Darby Technology Centre; First Resources Ltd.; Genting Plantation, Olam International, Musim Mas, and Syngenta Crop Protection, outside the submitted work. The other authors declare no other competing interests. This research is supported by the National Research Foundation Singapore under its Open Fund-Large Collaborative Grant (MOH-001636) (A-8002641-00-00) and administered by the Singapore Ministry of Health’s National Medical Research Council.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Measurement properties of the Comprehensive Quality-of-Life Measure for Acne (CompAQ): a cohort study at three international sites.Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jul 17;193(2):267-275. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf127. Br J Dermatol. 2025. PMID: 40181218
-
Topical, light-based, and complementary interventions for acne: an overview of systematic reviews.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 23;10(10):CD014918. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014918.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39440650
-
Interventions for acne scars.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 3;4(4):CD011946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011946.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27038134 Free PMC article.
-
Complementary therapies for acne vulgaris.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 19;1(1):CD009436. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009436.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 25597924 Free PMC article.
-
Light therapies for acne.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 27;9(9):CD007917. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007917.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27670126 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Chen H, Zhang T, Yin X, Man J, Yang X, Lu M. Magnitude and temporal trend of acne vulgaris burden in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019: an analysis from the Global Burden of disease study 2019. Br J Dermatol. 2022;186(4):673–83. - PubMed
-
- White GM. Recent findings in the epidemiologic evidence, classification, and subtypes of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;39(2 Pt 3):S34–7. - PubMed
-
- Ali F. Determination of various risk factors associated with acne vulgaris infection in quetta, Pakistan. Pure Appl Biol. 2019;8(3).
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources