Variability and Advancements in ChatGPT Risk of Bias Assessments: A Replication and Comparative Analysis
- PMID: 40528564
- PMCID: PMC12174634
- DOI: 10.1111/jebm.70046
Variability and Advancements in ChatGPT Risk of Bias Assessments: A Replication and Comparative Analysis
Keywords: data extraction; large language models (LLMs); risk of bias.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Fischer U., Kaesmacher J., Strbian D., et al., “Thrombectomy Alone Versus Intravenous Alteplase Plus Thrombectomy in Patients With Stroke: An Open‐Label, Blinded‐Outcome, Randomised Non‐Inferiority Trial,” Lancet 400, no. 10346 (2022): 104–115. - PubMed
-
- Mcgarvey L. P., Birring S. S., Morice A. H., et al., “Efficacy and Safety of Gefapixant, a P2×3 Receptor Antagonist, in Refractory Chronic Cough and Unexplained Chronic Cough (COUGH‐1 and COUGH‐2): Results From Two Double‐Blind, Randomised, Parallel‐Group, Placebo‐Controlled, Phase 3 Trials,” Lancet 399, no. 10328 (2022): 909–923. - PubMed
-
- Mitchell P. J., Yan B., Churilov L., et al., “Endovascular Thrombectomy Versus Standard Bridging Thrombolytic With Endovascular Thrombectomy Within 4·5 h of Stroke Onset: An Open‐Label, Blinded‐Endpoint, Randomised Non‐Inferiority Trial,” Lancet 400, no. 10346 (2022): 116–125. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
