Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Mar 11;6(6):100874.
doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2025.100874. eCollection 2025 Jun 2.

Untethered miniature robots for minimally invasive thrombus treatment: From bench to clinical trials

Affiliations
Review

Untethered miniature robots for minimally invasive thrombus treatment: From bench to clinical trials

Qinglong Wang et al. Innovation (Camb). .

Abstract

Untethered miniature robots (MRs) offer a minimally invasive way to address adverse vascular blockages, such as cerebrovascular thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, and pulmonary embolism. This review explores three key questions: what are the design principles of MRs from both engineering and clinical perspectives? How can visible intervention of MRs in three-dimensional (3D) branched vessels be achieved? What is the clinical procedure for treating thrombus using designed MRs? Recent progress in MRs for thrombus removal is summarized, and, more importantly, the pros and cons of MRs are discussed. We also evaluate the challenges that may hinder their clinical deployment and propose future research directions, bridging the gap between the bench and the bedside.

Keywords: clinical trial; miniature robots; minimally invasive intervention; thrombus treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Properties of the cerebral vascular environment (A) Schematic of cerebral blood vessels. (B) Real CT imaging of human cerebral blood vessels. Copyright 2014, The Authors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison between direct i.v. injection and catheterization for long-distance delivery of MRs
Figure 3
Figure 3
Actuation mechanism of various MRs, including light-driven, magnetic-driven, acoustic-driven, chemical-driven, and biohybrid-driven MRs ∇p refers to the pressure gradient; ∇T refers to the temperature gradient; λ refers to the wavelength of acoustic waves; d refers to the dimension of the MRs; Fdrive refers to the driving force; Fdrag refers to the viscous drag force; Vbubble refers to the bubble’s velocity; V0 is the velocity of the initial horizontal component of the detached bubble; FN refers to the normal drag force perpendicular to the tail surface; FT refers to the tangential drag force parallel to the tail surface; v, M, B, τ, and F denote the volume and magnetization of the MR, magnetic flux of the external magnetic field, magnetic torque, and magnetic gradient force, respectively. Part of the schematic was created using BioRender.com.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Examples of common imaging modalities used for imaging and localization of MRs (A–F) Various imaging tools used for MRs, including (A) fluorescence imaging (FI), Copyright 2021, The Authors; (B) photoacoustic computed tomography (PACT) imaging, Copyright 2022, The Authors; (C) laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI), Copyright 2024, The Authors; (D) ultrasound (US) imaging, Copyright 2021, The Authors; (E) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Copyright 2022, The Authors; and (F) X-ray fluoroscopy imaging. Copyright 2024, The Authors. (G) Comparison of imaging modalities in terms of spatial resolution, temporal resolution, and penetration depth.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Thrombus removal using millimeter-scale robots Two typical examples of millimeter-scale robots for thrombus removal by mechanical disruption (A) (Copyright 2020, IEEE) and a combination of mechanical disruption and chemical degradation (B). Copyright 2015, AIP.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Mechanisms of thrombus removal using micro/nanometer-scale robots Various thrombus removal mechanisms, including (A) hydrodynamic convection, Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society; (B) photothermal ablation, Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society; (C) sonodynamic therapy, Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society; (D) mechanical interaction, Copyright 2017, WILEY-VCH; (E) chemical lysis, Copyright 2020, The Authors; and (F) mechanical interaction with chemical lysis and hydrodynamic convection. Copyright 2024, The Authors.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Drug-delivery modes and blood-clot removal mechanisms (A) The scheme of thrombus removal using MRs with three drug-delivery modes. (B) Scheme of primary thrombus removal mechanisms, including enzyme catalysis, mechanical rubbing, and hydrodynamic convection.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Schematic of detailed intervention procedures using MRs for ischemic stroke treatment Part of the schematic was created using BioRender.com.
Figure 9
Figure 9
A proposed pathway toward clinical translation of MRs designed for endovascular recanalization Part of the schematic was created using BioRender.com.

Similar articles

References

    1. Wahlgren N., Ahmed N., Dávalos A., et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST): an observational study. Lancet. 2007;369:275–282. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60149-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Emberson J., Lees K.R., Lyden P., et al. Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;384:1929–1935. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60584-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang B., Wang Q., Chan K.F., et al. tPA-anchored nanorobots for in vivo arterial recanalization at submillimeter-scale segments. Sci. Adv. 2024;10 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adk8970. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hortelao A.C., Simó C., Guix M., et al. Monitoring the collective behavior of enzymatic nanomotors in vitro and in vivo by PET-CT. bioRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.06.22.146282. Preprint at. - DOI
    1. Teasell R.W., Foley N.C., Bhogal S.K., et al. An evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 2003;10:29–58. doi: 10.1310/8YNA-1YHK-YMHB-XTE1. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources