Current Perspectives on Perioperative Combination Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- PMID: 40528897
- PMCID: PMC12169868
- DOI: 10.1159/000546138
Current Perspectives on Perioperative Combination Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Abstract
Background: Multidisciplinary treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has made notable advancements with the emergence of novel agents for systemic therapies, including receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and cancer immuno-oncology (IO) therapy utilizing immune checkpoint inhibitors. Although each of these regimens is effective as monotherapy for advanced HCCs, combining them with locoregional therapy (LRT), such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), and radiotherapy (RT), provides an additional antitumor effect. The emergence of novel systemic therapies has given rise to anticipation for the development of multidisciplinary treatments with a combination of systemic therapy and LRT, which aim to achieve curative-intent resection and improve long-term prognosis after resection.
Summary: Perioperative combination therapy, a combination of multiple treatment modalities including systemic therapy (TKI and/or IO) and LRT (TACE, HAIC, or RT), is attracting attention as a potentially useful approach for multidisciplinary curative-intent surgical resection or ablation. Currently, there is no evidence-based guidance regarding selection criteria and optimal regimens for perioperative combination therapy. The definition of oncological resectability for HCC is being pursued to establish the indication and protocol for perioperative combination therapy, which broadly encompasses conversion as well as neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for intermediate-to-advanced HCC.
Key messages: Perioperative combination therapy, which positions curative-intent surgical resection or ablation within the combination of multiple modalities including systemic therapy and LRT, provides perspectives for improving the long-term prognosis of patients with initially unresectable HCC and borderline resectable HCC with a high risk of recurrence.
Keywords: Adjuvant; Borderline resectable lesions; Conversion; Neoadjuvant therapy; Resectability.
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Conflict of interest statement
Etsuro Hatano was a member of the journal’s Editorial Board at the time of submission.
Figures
References
-
- Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Gane E, Blanc JF, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(4):378–90. - PubMed
-
- Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S, Han K-H, Ikeda K, Piscaglia F, et al. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10126):1163–73. - PubMed
-
- Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, Galle PR, Ducreux M, Kim T-Y, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(20):1894–905. - PubMed
-
- Abou-Alfa GK, Lau G, Kudo M, Chan SL, Kelley RK, Furuse J, et al. Tremelimumab plus durvalumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. NEJM Evid. 2022;1(8):EVIDoa2100070. - PubMed
-
- Galle PR, Decaens T, Kudo M, Qin S, Fonseca L, Sangro B, et al. Nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) vs lenvatinib (LEN) or sorafenib (SOR) as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): first results from CheckMate 9DW. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(17_Suppl l). LBA4008–LBA.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
