Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 17;6(6):e70040.
doi: 10.1002/bco2.70040. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Mental well-being in prostate cancer: A multi-institutional prospective cohort study

Affiliations

Mental well-being in prostate cancer: A multi-institutional prospective cohort study

Oliver Brunckhorst et al. BJUI Compass. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the patient, treatment and oncological prognostic factors for multiple mental well-being outcomes in prostate cancer.

Patient and methods: The MIND-P study was a multi-institutional prospective cohort study recruiting newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients for 12 months post-diagnosis across eight centres. Periodic data collection evaluated mental, physical and social well-being measures incorporating five mental well-being outcomes selected based on prior research as important measures in patients with prostate cancer. This included depression, anxiety, fear of recurrence, body image, and masculinity. Treatment, patient, and oncological prognostic factors for developing significant well-being symptoms were evaluated along with symptom trajectories.

Results: Of 300 patients recruited, 13.7% and 11.0% developed depression or anxiety symptoms, with 45.0% developing at least one significant mental well-being symptom. Those undergoing hormone monotherapy had higher depression scores from 6 months post-diagnosis (all p < 0.05), with prostatectomy patients having poorer body image and masculinity scores, when compared with surveillance patients (all p < 0.02). Metastatic disease at diagnosis was associated with increased depression, anxiety and fear of cancer recurrence. Patient factors for poorer mental well-being included younger age, a previous psychiatric history, social deprivation, poorer baseline mental health symptoms and poorer baseline sexual and urinary function. Symptom trajectory analysis demonstrated the increasing symptom load in body image and masculine self-esteem experienced post any active treatment modality, with more stable scores for other mental well-being measures.

Conclusion: A high incidence of multiple mental well-being issues was identified post-diagnosis, highlighting their individual importance during follow-up. Baseline mental and functional symptoms, a previous psychiatric history and stage at diagnosis appear to be particularly important prognostic factors for the development of significant symptoms. A comprehensive initial biopsychosocial assessment incorporating these could identify high-risk patients for improved monitoring and subsequent support. ClinicalTrials.gov number - NCT04647474.

Keywords: anxiety; body image; depression; masculinity; prostate cancer; quality of life; survivorship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

P.D. is advisor to Proximie and Chief Medical Officer to MysteryVibe.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram of study follow‐up numbers. AS, active surveillance; RP, radical prostatectomy; RT, radical radiotherapy.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Trajectory of mean mental well‐being outcome scores divided by management modality undergone.

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. 10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, et al. Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE‐5—a population‐based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:23–34. - PubMed
    1. Halpern MT, Argenbright KE. Evaluation of effectiveness of survivorship programmes: how to measure success? Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(1):e51–e59. 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30563-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Richards M, Corner J, Maher J. The National Cancer Survivorship Initiative: new and emerging evidence on the ongoing needs of cancer survivors. Br J Cancer. 2011;105(1):S1–S4. 10.1038/bjc.2011.416 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bourke L, Boorjian SA, Briganti A, Klotz L, Mucci L, Resnick MJ, et al. Survivorship and improving quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;68(3):374–383. 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.023 - DOI - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources