Otolaryngology Applicants' Preferences for Virtual vs In-Person Interviews During the 2023-2024 Application Cycle
- PMID: 40529274
- PMCID: PMC12168982
- DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00894.1
Otolaryngology Applicants' Preferences for Virtual vs In-Person Interviews During the 2023-2024 Application Cycle
Abstract
Background Since the shift to virtual residency interviews, applicants and programs have reported difficulty distinguishing themselves in a virtual format, reduced exposure to medical campuses, and limited opportunity to establish personal connections. The 2023-2024 application cycle was the first time virtual and in-person interview formats were available in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS). Programs offered one or both formats, and in some cases, applicants were given the choice between the 2. Objective To assess the perceptions of OHNS applicants regarding virtual versus in-person interviews during the 2023-2024 application cycle. Methods A 20-question survey was distributed via email through the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) to OHNS applicants after Match Day during the 2023-2024 application cycle. The survey consisted of multiple-choice, Likert-scale, and open-ended questions to explore applicant preferences surrounding interview format. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and statistical significance tests (Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact tests) to compare responses across different demographic groups. Results The survey achieved a 42% response rate (216 of 511). Of 199 respondents, 144 (72%) preferred in-person interviews. Subgroup comparisons showed no significant differences between gender. While applicants who identify as underrepresented in medicine (URiM) reported a strong preference for in-person interviews 24 of 35 (69%), their rate of preferring virtual interviews was higher than that of applicants who did not identify as URiM (χ2=15.5, df=2, P=.001). Of 199 respondents, 152 (76%) preferred allowing individual programs to choose their interview format. Conclusions Overall, OHNS applicants show greater satisfaction with, and preference for, in-person interviews.
Figures
Similar articles
-
General Surgery Residency Applicant Perspectives on Alternative Residency Interview Models with Implementation of an Optional Second Look Day.J Surg Educ. 2024 Nov;81(11):1784-1791. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.08.005. Epub 2024 Sep 23. J Surg Educ. 2024. PMID: 39317124
-
Not From Around Here: Evaluation of In-Person Interviews in an Urban General Surgery Residency Program.J Surg Educ. 2024 Dec;81(12):103283. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.09.002. Epub 2024 Oct 1. J Surg Educ. 2024. PMID: 39357294
-
Impact of Interview Modality on Gender Disparities in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Residency Match Success.J Surg Educ. 2025 May;82(5):103464. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103464. Epub 2025 Feb 19. J Surg Educ. 2025. PMID: 39978302
-
Evidence-Based Practices for Interviewing Graduate Medical Education Applicants: A Systematic Review.J Grad Med Educ. 2024 Apr;16(2):151-165. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00115.1. Epub 2024 Apr 15. J Grad Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 38993318 Free PMC article.
-
Prenatal administration of progestogens for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 20;2019(11):CD012024. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012024.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31745984 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Association of American Medical Colleges. Coalition for Physician Accountability. Final Report and Recommendations for Medical Education Institutions of LCME-Accredited, U.S. Osteopathic, and Non-U.S. Medical School Applicants. Published 2020. Accessed February 3, 2025. https://www.aamc.org/media/44731/download.
-
- Moore D.Not a cheap investment: estimating the cost of the 2017 to 2018 ophthalmology residency Match to the applicant and program .J Acad Ophthalmol 20181001e158–e162.doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675846 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous