Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 15;12(3):253-260.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2025.04.008. eCollection 2025 May.

Identifying the key influencing factors of psychological birth trauma in primiparous women with interpretable machine learning

Affiliations

Identifying the key influencing factors of psychological birth trauma in primiparous women with interpretable machine learning

Yuze Wu et al. Int J Nurs Sci. .

Abstract

Objective: Accurately identifying the key influencing factors of psychological birth trauma in primiparous women is crucial for implementing effective preventive and intervention measures. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning prediction model for identifying the key influencing factors of psychological birth trauma in primiparous women.

Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted on primiparous women in four tertiary hospitals in Sichuan Province, southwestern China, from December 2023 to March 2024. The Childbirth Trauma Index was used in assessing psychological birth trauma in primiparous women. Data were collected and randomly divided into a training set (80 %, n = 289) and a testing set (20 %, n = 73). Six different machine learning models were trained and tested. Training and prediction were conducted using six machine learning models included Linear Regression, Support Vector Regression, Multilayer Perceptron Regression, eXtreme Gradient Boosting Regression, Random Forest Regression, and Adaptive Boosting Regression. The optimal model was selected based on various performance metrics, and its predictive results were interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and accumulated local effects (ALE).

Results: Among the six machine learning models, the Multilayer Perceptron Regression model exhibited the best overall performance in the testing set (MAE = 3.977, MSE = 24.832, R 2 = 0.507, EVS = 0.524, RMSE = 4.983). In the testing set, the R 2 and EVS of the Multilayer Perceptron Regression model increased by 8.3 % and 1.2 %, respectively, compared to the traditional linear regression model. Meanwhile, the MAE, MSE, and RMSE decreased by 0.4 %, 7.3 %, and 3.7 %, respectively, compared to the traditional linear regression model. The SHAP analysis indicated that intrapartum pain, anxiety, postpartum pain, resilience, and planned pregnancy are the most critical influencing factors of psychological birth trauma in primiparous women. The ALE analysis indicated that higher intrapartum pain, anxiety, and postpartum pain scores are risk factors, while higher resilience scores are protective factors.

Conclusions: Interpretable machine learning prediction models can identify the key influencing factors of psychological birth trauma in primiparous women. SHAP and ALE analyses based on the Multilayer Perceptron Regression model can help healthcare providers understand the complex decision-making logic within a prediction model. This study provides a scientific basis for the early prevention and personalized intervention of psychological birth trauma in primiparous women.

Keywords: Influencing factor; Machine learning; Primiparous women; Psychological birth trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Analysis flow for the development and evaluation of the models. MAE = mean absolute error. MSE = mean squared error. EVS = explained variance score. RMSE = root mean squared error. SHAP = SHapley Additive exPlanations. ALE = accumulated local effects.

Similar articles

References

    1. Ayers S., Horsch A., Garthus-Niegel S., Nieuwenhuijze M., Bogaerts A., Hart Mann K., et al. Traumatic birth and childbirth-related post-traumatic stress disorder: international expert consensus recommendations for practice, policy, and research. Women Birth. 2024;37(2):362–367. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.11.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sun X.Q., Fan X.M., Cong S.N., Wang R., Sha L.J., Xie H.Y., et al. Psychological birth trauma: a concept analysis. Front Psychol. 2023;13 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1065612. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xu Y.X., Wang W.J., Zhou L.H., Xu W.L., Wang H., Zhang F.Y., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and risk factors for psychological birth trauma. Nurs Res. 2025;74(2):123–129. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000792. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Green G., Tesler R., Marques A. Primiparous and multiparous women's mode of birth and negative emotions. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2022;19(9):5189. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095189. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beck C.T. Middle range theory of traumatic childbirth: the ever-widening ripple effect. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2015;2 doi: 10.1177/2333393615575313. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources