Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 3:16:1588986.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1588986. eCollection 2025.

Estimating the optimal number of samples to determine the effective population size in livestock

Affiliations

Estimating the optimal number of samples to determine the effective population size in livestock

Arianna Manunza et al. Front Genet. .

Abstract

Effective population size (Ne) is a key parameter in various biological disciplines, including evolutionary biology, conservation genetics, and livestock breeding programs. When applying genomic approaches to estimate Ne or other indicators of genetic variation, sample size is among the critical factors that directly affect the balance between cost and precision. In this study, we investigated the impact of sample size on Ne estimates by analyzing data from previous genotyping studies and simulations. Our results suggest that a sample size of 50 animals is a reasonable approximation of the "true" ("unbiased") Ne value within the populations analyzed. While estimating the Ne value is an important starting point in population genetics, additional factors, such as the degree of inbreeding, population structure, and admixture, must be taken into account to obtain a comprehensive genetic evaluation and avoid misinterpretation. We conclude that linkage disequilibrium (LD)-based approaches are well suited for the estimation of Ne in livestock populations. However, careful interpretation of results is essential as current bioinformatics tools may introduce potential biases due to methodological assumptions, marker density, or population-specific factors.

Keywords: SNP arrays; conservation; effective population size; simulation; small ruminants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Ne estimates calculated for the four breeds of the two species over a range of sizes: 20, 50, and 100 animals. (A) Solid circles represent the estimates from 100 independent iterations and (B) each black point corresponds to the mean value of 100 estimates with the CI. The “true” effective size, the value of which was calculated based on the entire dataset, is indicated by the red horizontal line.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Simulated scenarios. The Ne estimates of 20, 50, and 100 subsampled individuals for every population are plotted against the effective sizes calculated for the whole population (indicated by the red horizontal line whose value can be retrieved in Supplementary Table S2). (A) Solid circles represent the estimates from 100 independent iterations and (B) each black point corresponds to the averaged value of 100 estimates. The black point shows the harmonic mean of 100 estimates.

Similar articles

References

    1. Ajmone-Marsan P., Boettcher P. J., Colli L., Ginja C., Kantanen J., Lenstra J. A. (2023). Genomic characterization of animal genetic resources–practical guide. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines No. 32. Rome, Italy: FAO. 10.4060/cc3079en - DOI
    1. Álvarez I., Royo L. J., Gutiérrez J. P., Fernández I., Arranz J. J., Goyache F., et al. (2008). Relationship between genealogical and microsatellite information characterizing losses of genetic variability: empirical evidence from the rare Xalda sheep breed. Livest. Sci. 115, 80–88. 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.06.009 - DOI
    1. Becker G. M., Thorne J. W., Burke J. M., Lewis R. M., Notter D. R., Morgan J. L. M., et al. (2024). Genetic diversity of United States rambouillet, katahdin and dorper sheep. Genet. Sel. Evol. 56 (1), 56. 10.1186/s12711-024-00905-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beichman A. C., Huerta-Sanchez E., Lohmueller K. E. (2018). Using genomic data to infer historic population dynamics of nonmodel organisms. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 49, 433–456. 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110617 - DOI
    1. Bruford M. W., Ginja C., Hoffmann I., Joost S., Wengel P. O., Alberto F. J., et al. (2015). Prospects and challenges for the conservation of farm animal genomic resources, 2015-2025. Front. Genet. 6 (OCT), 314. 10.3389/fgene.2015.00314 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources