Optimising the Use of Cryopreserved Genetic Resources for the Selection and Conservation of Animal Populations
- PMID: 40530768
- DOI: 10.1111/jbg.70000
Optimising the Use of Cryopreserved Genetic Resources for the Selection and Conservation of Animal Populations
Abstract
Genetic diversity is essential for the sustainability and adaptability of populations, and is thus a central pillar of the agro-ecological transition. However, within a population, it is inevitable that some amount of genetic variability is lost, and efforts must be made to limit this as much as possible. A valuable tool in this endeavour could be the use of cryopreserved genetic resources in cryobanks, which could assist in the management of various animal populations in the contexts of both selection and conservation. We performed simulations that revealed that the most appropriate use of ex situ genetic resources depends on characteristics of the target population and its management objectives. For populations under conservation, the aim is to maintain genetic diversity, which was best achieved by the regular use of cryopreserved genetic resources at each generation. For populations under selection, instead, the concern is the addition of additive genetic variability, which benefited from the use of cryopreserved collections over only a few generations based primarily on the genetic values of donors. The use of cryopreserved semen had a beneficial effect when breeding objectives were changed. In both cases, the use of cryopreserved individuals in animal populations requires a large amount of reproductive material: for breeds under selection because the number of offspring is high, and for breeds under conservation because the frozen semen is used repeatedly over a long period. The use of cryopreserved material appears to be an effective means of managing the genetic variability of an animal population, either by slowing down the erosion of variability or by helping to redirect a selection objective. However, care must be taken with populations under selection to limit the disadvantages associated with the reintroduction of old genetic material, in particular the gap in breeding values for traits of interest. Finally, our study highlights the need for a sufficiently large stock of cryopreserved material in collections (e.g., number of doses, straws) to ensure the most efficient use.
Keywords: animal populations; ex situ conservation; gene bank; genetic diversity; simulations.
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x. Respir Res. 2024. PMID: 39709425 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Molecular feature-based classification of retroperitoneal liposarcoma: a prospective cohort study.Elife. 2025 May 23;14:RP100887. doi: 10.7554/eLife.100887. Elife. 2025. PMID: 40407808 Free PMC article.
-
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025. PMID: 40493548 Free PMC article.
-
A scoping review of tropical pioneer trees' roles for restoration and conservation management: Harungana madagascariensis (Hypericaceae) a widespread African species as a model.PeerJ. 2025 May 23;13:e19458. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19458. eCollection 2025. PeerJ. 2025. PMID: 40421372 Free PMC article.
-
SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Brain [18F]FDG PET Imaging, Version 2.0.J Nucl Med. 2025 Jun 6;66(Suppl 2):S45-S60. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268754. J Nucl Med. 2025. PMID: 39419552
References
-
- Chang, C. C., C. C. Chow, L. C. Tellier, S. Vattikuti, S. M. Purcell, and J. J. Lee. 2015. “Second‐Generation PLINK: Rising to the Challenge of Larger and Richer Datasets.” GigaScience 4: 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13742‐015‐0047‐8.
-
- Chapman, J. R., S. Nakagawa, D. W. Coltman, J. Slate, and B. C. Sheldon. 2009. “A Quantitative Review of Heterozygosity–Fitness Correlations in Animal Populations.” Molecular Ecology 18: 2746–2765. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365‐294X.2009.04247.x.
-
- Chapuis, H., C. Pincent, and J. J. Colleau. 2016. “Optimizing Selection With Several Constraints in Poultry Breeding.” Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 133: 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12178.
-
- Colleau, J.‐J., S. Moureaux, M. Briend, and J. Bechu. 2004. “A Method for the Dynamic Management of Genetic Variability in Dairy Cattle.” Genetics Selection Evolution 36: 373–394. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297‐9686‐36‐4‐373.
-
- Danchin Burge, C., E. Verrier, S. Moureaux, M. Tixier‐Boichard, and B. Bibe. 2006. “Sampling Strategies and Overview of the French National Cryobank Collections.” In In: 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Belo Horizonte.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous