Long-Term Trends and Projections of Multiple Myeloma Across Three Continents: A Comparative Study of China, the United States of America, the Russian Federation, England and France (1990-2036)
- PMID: 40530908
- PMCID: PMC12175481
- DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70999
Long-Term Trends and Projections of Multiple Myeloma Across Three Continents: A Comparative Study of China, the United States of America, the Russian Federation, England and France (1990-2036)
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to analyse trends in the burden of multiple myeloma (MM) in the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (China, the United States of America, the Russian Federation, England, and France) to understand country differences and factors.
Methods: The Global Burden of Disease Study 2021 was utilised to analyse the incidence and mortality trends of MM from 1990 to 2021. An age-period-cohort model was employed to evaluate the disparities among nations, while an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model was employed to forecast the impending developments over the subsequent 15 years.
Results: The study found the burden of MM continues to increase in China and the Russian Federation, with significant increases particularly in older age groups. In the United States of America, age-standardised incidence rates (ASIR) and age-standardised death rates (ASDR) showed a downward trend, reflecting a reduction in the burden of disease. In England and France, ASIR increased overall, but ASDR remained stable. The burden of MM was found to be significantly correlated with age, period effect, and birth cohort through age-period-cohort analysis. The ARIMA model predictions indicated an increasing trend in ASIR and a stable ASDR in China and the Russian Federation, while in England, France, and the United States of America, there was an overall stabilisation of ASIR and ASDR.
Conclusions: Significant differences in the burden of MM were found among the five countries. China and the Russian Federation are facing an increasing MM burden, particularly in older age groups, while the United States of America, England and France have made progress through early screening and treatment. The study suggests focusing on older populations, promoting early diagnosis and personalised treatment, and addressing lifestyle and environmental factors. Future research should examine risk factors across countries to inform public health policy.
Keywords: United Nations Security Council; age‐period‐cohort; deaths; incidence; multiple myeloma; secular trends.
© 2025 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Incidence and disability-adjusted life-years of infective endocarditis in China from 1990 to 2021: comparison with G20 based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 6;15(7):e094490. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094490. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40623737 Free PMC article.
-
The burden of low back pain in BRICS: an analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021.Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 30;13:1563260. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1563260. eCollection 2025. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40662107 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic analysis of gout burden among young adults in China from 1990 to 2021: findings from the global burden of disease study 2021.Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 9;13:1613801. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1613801. eCollection 2025. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40552223 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and odds of anxiety and depression in cutaneous malignant melanoma: a proportional meta-analysis and regression.Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jun 20;191(1):24-35. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae011. Br J Dermatol. 2024. PMID: 38197404
-
Global, regional, and national burden of shoulder dislocation 1990-2021: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study 2021.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 May 9:S1058-2746(25)00379-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.03.037. Online ahead of print. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025. PMID: 40349910 Review.
References
-
- Rajkumar S. V., Dimopoulos M. A., Palumbo A., et al., “International Myeloma Working Group Updated Criteria for the Diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma,” Lancet Oncology 15, no. 12 (2014): e538–e548. - PubMed
-
- Kumar S. K., Rajkumar V., Kyle R. A., et al., “Multiple Myeloma,” Nature Reviews. Disease Primers 20, no. 3 (2017): 17046. - PubMed
-
- “Management of Patients With Multiple Myeloma Beyond the Clinical‐Trial Setting: Understanding the Balance Between Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability, and Quality of Life,” (2024), accessed November 30, 2024, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33602913/. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Cowan A. J., Green D. J., Kwok M., et al., “Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Myeloma: A Review,” Journal of the American Medical Association 327, no. 5 (2022): 464–477. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical