Comparing 90-Day Reoperations in 23,301 Breast Reconstructions: Immediate Versus Delayed Direct-to-Implant or Autologous Reconstructions
- PMID: 40532244
- DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004421
Comparing 90-Day Reoperations in 23,301 Breast Reconstructions: Immediate Versus Delayed Direct-to-Implant or Autologous Reconstructions
Abstract
Background: In recent years, breast reconstruction following mastectomy has gained popularity. This study aimed to compare short-term unplanned return to the operating room (OR) for women undergoing breast reconstruction after mastectomy for malignancy by reconstruction timing, delayed compared to immediate (IBR). Subcategories of direct-to-implant and primarily autologous reconstruction were analyzed.
Methods: Data from an integrated electronic medical record system identified patients undergoing breast reconstruction after mastectomy at Kaiser Permanente facilities between 2010-2022. Reconstruction timing was the exposure of interest, with stratification based on reconstructive techniques including tissue expander followed by either implant or autologous reconstruction, direct-to-implant, or primarily autologous reconstruction. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models assessed the association between reconstruction timing and 90-day reoperations in direct-to-implant or primarily autologous reconstruction, using delayed reconstruction as the reference.
Results: A total of 23,272 cases were identified (immediate = 18,248, delayed = 5025). The IBR patients exhibited higher odds of reoperations [odds ratio (OR) = 1.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.65-2.33, P < 0.0001] compared to delayed reconstruction after covariate adjustment. Among patients with expanders, IBR increased reoperation odds (OR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.43-2.33, P < 0.0001). Immediate direct-to-implant reconstruction had the highest reoperation odds (OR = 5.55, 95% CI = 2.08-4.67, P = 0.039). No significant differences were observed between immediate and delayed approaches in autologous reconstruction, regardless of whether it was conducted in a single- or 2-stage process.
Conclusions: Immediate reconstruction, involving expanders or direct-to-implant reconstructions, showed increased 90-day reoperation risks compared to delayed reconstruction. Conversely, no significant differences were identified between IBR and delayed reconstruction with autologous reconstruction conducted in a single- or 2-stage process.
Keywords: breast reconstruction; cohort study; delayed breast reconstruction; immediate breast reconstruction; reoperation; return to care.
Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared.
References
-
- Menon G, Alkabban FM, Ferguson T. Breast Cancer. [Updated 2024 Feb 25]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482286/ . Accessed May 28, 2025.
-
- DeBrock W, Pittelkow E, Christopher L, et al. Abstract 75: advantages of the delayed-immediate microsurgical breast reconstruction: extending the choice. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open . 2020;8(4S):48–49.
-
- Filip CI, Jecan CR, Raducu L, et al. Immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction for postmastectomy patients. Controversies and solutions. Chirurgia (Bucur) . 2017;112:378–386.
-
- Surgery ASoP. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2022 plastic surgery statistics report. 2022. Available at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2022/plastic-su... . Accessed December 09, 2023, 2023.
-
- Hershman DL, Richards CA, Kalinsky K, et al. Influence of health insurance, hospital factors and physician volume on receipt of immediate post-mastectomy reconstruction in women with invasive and non-invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat . 2012;136:535–545.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
