Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;39(8):1905-1914.
doi: 10.1038/s41375-025-02650-2. Epub 2025 Jun 18.

Measurement of Immunoglobulin Intraclonal diversification refines the clinical impact of IGHV mutational status in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Affiliations

Measurement of Immunoglobulin Intraclonal diversification refines the clinical impact of IGHV mutational status in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Filippo Vit et al. Leukemia. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells may bear mutations in IGHV genes, the 2%-cutoff allowing to discriminate two subsets, unmutated (U)- or mutated (M)-CLL, with different clinical course. IGHV genes may also incorporate additional ongoing mutations, a phenomenon known as intraclonal diversification (ID). Here, through an original bioinformatic workflow for NGS data, we used the inverse Simpson Index (iSI) as diversity measure among IGHV sequences to dichotomize cases with different ID levels into IDhigh (iSI ≥ 1.2) vs. IDlow (iSI < 1.2) both in CLL (n = 983) and in other lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD; n = 127). In CLL, IDhigh cases accounted for 14.6%, overrepresented in M-CLL (P = 0.0028), while higher percentages were documented in GC-derived LPD. In M-CLL (n = 396), IDhigh patients (n = 69) experienced longer time-to-first treatment than IDlow patients (P = 0.015), and multivariate analyses (n = 299) confirmed ID as independent variable. IGHV gene mutations of IDhigh cases had molecular signatures indicating ongoing activity of the AID)/Polη-dependent machinery; consistently, IDhigh M-CLL expressed higher levels of AID transcripts than IDlow M-CLL (P = 0.012). In conclusion, we propose a robust NGS protocol to quantitatively evaluate ID in CLL, demonstrating that: i) all CLL patients presented ID although at various degree; ii) high degree of ID has clinical relevance identifying a M-CLL subset with better outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was carried out in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki upon IRB approval (Approval n. IRB-05-2010 and n. IRB-05- 2015, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico of Aviano; Approval n. 10C0066, National Cancer Institute; Approval, University of Würzburg, January 17th, 2006), and informed consent.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow-chart of the study with the number of patients analyzed.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Illustrative phylogenetic trees in dependence of presence of IGHV Intraclonal Diversification (ID).
A ID was calculated from the Hill number-based diversity profiles of diversity indices. Among the different Hill number-derived indices, the inverse Simpson index (iSI, corresponding to a Hill number = 2) was selected. B Phylogenetic tree examples of three different CLL samples with increasing iSI. Nodes in the tree can be either the root node (orange node), leaves (sequences of cells that had no descendants; green nodes), or internal nodes. Internal nodes can be either split nodes, those with more than one child (light blue nodes); or pass-through nodes, those with exactly one child (red nodes). Size of the circle corresponds to the percentage of the specific subclone inside the pathological clone.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Diversity score in lymphoproliferative disease.
A The scatter plot depicts the iSI calculated for 983 CLL versus the percentage of the Major Clone (clone with the higher percentage) inside the identified pathological clone. B Maximally selected rank statistics graphs for the determination of the best iSI cutoff. C Kaplan-Meier curves comparing TTFT probabilities of 327 M IGHV cases with low intraclonal (iSI < 1.2; IDlow; green line), 69 M IGHV cases with high intraclonal (iSI ≥ 1.2; IDhigh) (purple line), 328 U IGHV cases with low intraclonal (light blue line), and 35 U IGHV cases with high intraclonal (red line). The number of patients in each group is reported; P value refers to log-rank test. D Boxplots report the distribution of diversity score calculated by means of Inverse Simpson Index (iSI) in different lymphoproliferative disease. Dotted line refers to iSI cutoff of 1.2.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Distribution of IGHV families and genes in the CLL cohort among samples with low or high intraclonal diversification (ID).
A The barchart reports the number of CLL cases in dependence of IGHV families according the IGHV mutational status and divided by the presence or not of ID. B The barchart reports the number of CLL cases in dependence of IGHV genes divided according to the IGHV mutational status (mutated: M, unmutated: U) and the presence or not of ID. Light-blue bars represent unmutated IGHV (U-CLL) and IDlow cases, red bars represent U-CLL and IDhigh cases, green bars represent mutated IGHV (M-CLL) and IDlow cases, purple bars represent M-CLL and IDhigh cases. P value refers to chi-square test.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Evaluation of mutability rate.
A Activation Induced Cytidine Deaminase (AID) activity. The boxplots on the right report the number of mutations compatible with AID mutational activity in both forward (WRC, W = A/T, R = A/G) and reverse strands (GYW, Y = C/T, W = A/T). The number of mutations occurring in AID coldspots for both the forward and reverse strand are reported on the left (SYC and GRS, S = G/C, Y = C/T, R = A/G). B The boxplots report the expression level of AID samples, 27 IDhigh (19 M-, and 8 U-CLL) and 65 IDlow samples (40 M-, and 25 U-CLL). C The graphs report the density of replacement (R) and silent (S) mutations in dependence of the IGHV gene position. Green boxes represent M IGHV and IDlow cases, purple boxes represent M IGHV and IDhigh cases. P values refer to student T-test.

Similar articles

References

    1. Eichhorst B, Ghia P, Niemann CU, Kater AP, Gregor M, Hallek M, et al. ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline interim update on new targeted therapies in the first line and at relapse of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Ann Oncol. 2024;35:762–8. - PubMed
    1. Hallek M, Al-Sawaf O. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: 2022 update on diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Am J Hematol. 2021;96:1679–705. - PubMed
    1. Shadman M. Diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a review. JAMA. 2023;329:918–32. - PubMed
    1. Cohen JA, Bomben R, Pozzo F, Tissino E, Härzschel A, Hartmann TN, et al. An updated perspective on current prognostic and predictive biomarkers in chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the context of chemoimmunotherapy and novel targeted therapy. Cancers. 2020;12:894. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee J, Wang YL. Prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Mol Diagn. 2020;22:1114–25. - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources