Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 18;23(1):681.
doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06641-w.

Spatial-temporal radiogenomics in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy for breast cancer: a comprehensive review

Affiliations
Review

Spatial-temporal radiogenomics in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy for breast cancer: a comprehensive review

Tingfeng Zhang et al. J Transl Med. .

Abstract

Radiomics is undergoing a paradigm shift from single-omics to multi-omics, from single-temporal to multi-temporal analysis, and from global to subregional analysis. These transformations have shown great potential in addressing key challenges related to imaging changes before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer. Furthermore, radiomics has achieved remarkable progress in tasks such as exploring tumor heterogeneity and uncovering underlying biological mechanisms. Integrating imaging data with gene data offers novel perspectives for understanding imaging changes driven by specific genetic alterations. However, current radiomics studies on neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer have not yet achieved a close integration of imaging changes with underlying biological mechanisms. They are largely limited to simple associations between models and genomic data, without in-depth interpretation of the biological significance inherent in imaging features, which is essential to directly link these features with the dynamic progression of the disease. This review seeks to explore the spatial-temporal heterogeneity of imaging alterations observed during NAC for breast cancer, while assessing their biological implications using established analytical approaches. It highlights the distinct advantages of spatial-temporal radiomics in predictive model development and examines potential correlations between imaging dynamics and gene expression profiles before and after NAC. Additionally, we critically examines previous radiogenomics studies, providing theoretical insights into their limitations. Finally, the review proposes future directions and innovative approaches for applying spatial-temporal radiogenomics in NAC for breast cancer, serving as a valuable reference and roadmap for researchers and clinical practitioners in this field.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Radiogenomics; Spatial-temporal heterogeneity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Workflow of mutiomics model. (A) Radiomics Workflow Diagram: A diagram illustrating the steps involved in radiomics analysis. (B) Pathomics Workflow Diagram: A diagram showing the process of pathomics analysis. (C) Genomics Workflow Diagram: A diagram outlining the steps in genomics data analysis. (D) Metadata Diagram: A diagram displaying the structure of associated metadata. (E) Multi-Omics Data Diagram: A diagram representing the integration of multi-omics data
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Timeline of Spatial-Temporal heterogeneity on radiomics and radiogenomics
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The structure of Spatial-Temporal heterogeneity in radiomics. A. Spatial Heterogeneity: Tumor Subregions; B. Temporal Heterogeneity: Tumor Shrinkage Before and After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy; C. Spatial-Temporal Heterogeneity: Four Response States of Tumors After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Subregional Changes; D. Spatial-Temporal Radiomics-Genomics Integrated Model. Diagram D uses partial responders after neoadjuvant therapy from Diagram C as an example, integrating tumor subregional changes before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with genetic information to provide a biological interpretation of these changes. (Complete Response, CR; Partial Response, PR; Stable Disease, SD; Progressive Disease, PD)

Similar articles

References

    1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229–63. 10.3322/caac.21834. - PubMed
    1. Aristokli N, Polycarpou I, Themistocleous SC, Sophocleous D, Mamais I. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound and mammography for detection of breast cancer based on tumor type, breast density and patient’s history: A review. Radiography (Lond). 2022;28(3):848–56. 10.1016/j.radi.2022.01.006. - PubMed
    1. Yang L, Wang S, Zhang L, Sheng C, Song F, Wang P, et al. Performance of ultrasonography screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):499. 10.1186/s12885-020-06992-1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benitez Fuentes JD, Morgan E, de Luna Aguilar A, Mafra A, Shah R, Giusti F, et al. Global stage distribution of breast Cancer at diagnosis: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2024;10(1):71–8. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.4837. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Filho OM, Viale G, Stein S, Trippa L, Yardley DA, Mayer IA, et al. Impact of HER2 heterogeneity on treatment response of Early-Stage HER2-Positive breast cancer: phase II neoadjuvant clinical trial of T-DM1 combined with Pertuzumab. Cancer Discov. 2021;11(10):2474–87. 10.1158/2159-8290.Cd-20-1557. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources