Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 18;11(1):51.
doi: 10.1186/s40780-025-00459-w.

Effectiveness of a formulary system on prophylactic oral proton pump inhibitors for drug-induced peptic ulcer in a Japanese tertiary hospital: an interrupted time series analysis

Affiliations

Effectiveness of a formulary system on prophylactic oral proton pump inhibitors for drug-induced peptic ulcer in a Japanese tertiary hospital: an interrupted time series analysis

Ryo Ishida et al. J Pharm Health Care Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Pharmacy formulary systems have been established recently in various fields of pharmacotherapies. We evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacy formulary interventions on proton pump inhibitors (PPI) used to prevent drug-induced peptic ulcers in a Japanese tertiary hospital.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in Kurashiki Central Hospital. A pharmacy formulary system of PPIs was implemented on October 1, 2020. Between April 2020 and March 2021, six months before and after the implementation date of the formulary system, inpatients aged ≥ 18 years were included if they newly received drugs (low-dose aspirin, anti-platelets, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) recommended for prophylactic PPI use for peptic ulcers within seven days from hospital admission. Eligible patients were divided into two groups based on the implementation date, and changes in PPI prescription patterns were evaluated by interrupted time series analysis, along with the risk of drug-induced peptic ulcers and drug costs.

Results: In total, 2,449 inpatients were included. The median age of the pre- and post-formulary group was 60 and 58 years, respectively. The proportion of the targeted PPI prescription increased by 8.75% (95% confidence interval (CI); 0.12, 17.38) in level change, without increased risk of drug-induced peptic ulcers (risk difference -0.41%, 95% CI; -1.38, 0.55). The distribution of medication days in the two groups was similar, and $1,000 per 90 patient days was saved on drug costs.

Conclusion: The formulary system on oral PPIs in a Japanese tertiary hospital contributed to a positive level change in the prescription patterns, without increased risk of drug-induced peptic ulcers. Although slight, the drug costs were saved.

Keywords: Cost-analysis; Drug-induced peptic ulcer; Hospital formulary; Interrupted time series; Proton pump inhibitor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Because the data were used after anonymization, this study was conducted following information disclosure and an opportunity to withdraw by the opt-out method specified in the Japanese ethical guidelines for medical and biological research involving human subjects as of 2021. This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kurashiki Central Hospital (No. 3759). Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the present study. (a) Although we defined admission for Helicobacter pylori infection as an exclusion criterion in advance, no patient was observed. (b) In-patients who received low-dose aspirin, anti-platelets, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within seven days from hospital admission. (c) The formulary system for PPI was applied officially on 10/01/2020 in the Kurashiki Central Hospital Abbreviations; PPI, proton pump inhibitor; LDA, low-dose aspirin; APT, anti-platelet therapy; NSAIDs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
ITS analysis for the intervention of the PPI formulary system. The date in the X-axis represents the start date of the segment. The proportion of the selected categories in each segment was plotted with each broken line. Continuous lines represent an estimate from an ordinary least-square regression. The thick orange vertical line on October 1, 2020, indicates the point at which the formulary intervention began. The plots of rabeprazole and histamine 2 receptor antagonists were excluded in this figure due to low frequency

Similar articles

References

    1. Tyler LS, Cole SW, May JR, et al. ASHP guidelines on the pharmacy and therapeutics committee and the formulary system. Am J Health Sys Pharm. 2008;65(13):1272–83. 10.2146/ajhp080086. - PubMed
    1. Ciccarello C, Leber MB, Leonard MC, et al. ASHP guidelines on the pharmacy and therapeutics committee and the formulary system. Am J Health Sys Pharm. 2021;78(10):907–18. 10.1093/ajhp/zxab080. - PubMed
    1. Walbrown MA, Aspinall SL, Bayliss NK, et al. Evaluation of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea with a drug formulary change in preferred fluoroquinolones. J Manag Care Pharm. 2008;14(1):34–40. 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.1.34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hashim S, Gomes T, Juurlink D, Hellings C, Mamdani M. The rise and fall of the Thiazolidinediones: impact of clinical evidence publication and formulary change on the prescription incidence of Thiazolidinediones. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2013;20(3):e238–242. - PubMed
    1. Shirneshan E, Kyrychenko P, Matlin OS, Avila JP, Brennan TA, Shrank WH. Impact of a transition to more restrictive drug formulary on therapy discontinuation and medication adherence. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016;41(1):64–9. 10.1111/jcpt.12349. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources