Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction with Healthcare Services in Poland
- PMID: 40534114
- PMCID: PMC12186550
- DOI: 10.12659/MSM.948225
Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction with Healthcare Services in Poland
Abstract
Patient satisfaction is a key indicator of healthcare quality, reflecting individuals' experiences with medical services and healthcare facilities. It is influenced by a wide range of factors, including the quality of care, communication with healthcare providers, accessibility, costs, system organization, and health outcomes. Digitalization of healthcare, including electronic medical records, e-prescriptions, and remote communication tools, is increasingly influencing patient satisfaction by improving accessibility and convenience of care. This review explores the main determinants of patient satisfaction in the context of the Polish healthcare system. The article identifies 6 thematic categories of influencing factors: quality of care, service accessibility and organization, patient-related variables (such as age, gender, or socioeconomic status), financial considerations, digitalization, and achieved health outcomes. Personalized communication and empathetic attitudes from healthcare professionals emerged as key drivers of satisfaction. Additionally, systemic aspects, including wait times and coordination of services, remain critical concerns for Polish patients. The review highlights the tools used to measure satisfaction in Poland, particularly the Patient and Staff Satisfaction Survey Tool (PASAT), developed by the National Center for Quality Monitoring in Healthcare. Regular satisfaction surveys serve not only as an internal quality assessment mechanism but also as a foundation for policy-making and system improvements. Despite numerous partial studies, there is a lack of standardized and comprehensive approaches to evaluating patient satisfaction at the national level. This article reviews the evaluation and determinants of patient satisfaction with healthcare services in Poland. All publications were analyzed using a nonsystematic review method.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35802350 Free PMC article.
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
-
Payment methods for outpatient care facilities.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 3;3(3):CD011153. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011153.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28253540 Free PMC article.
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 12065068
-
Rapid molecular tests for tuberculosis and tuberculosis drug resistance: a qualitative evidence synthesis of recipient and provider views.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 26;4(4):CD014877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014877.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35470432 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources