Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;28(6):e26507.
doi: 10.1002/jia2.26507.

Effectiveness of islatravir post-exposure prophylaxis after intravenous challenge with simian immunodeficiency virus in rhesus macaques

Affiliations

Effectiveness of islatravir post-exposure prophylaxis after intravenous challenge with simian immunodeficiency virus in rhesus macaques

Martin Markowitz et al. J Int AIDS Soc. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Islatravir (ISL) is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor (NRTTI) with robust antiretroviral activity. The efficacy of ISL administered for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) was evaluated in a simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) rhesus macaque intravenous (IV) challenge model.

Methods: Twelve rhesus macaques were challenged with SIVmac251 via IV administration. After 24 hours, six animals received ISL 3.9 mg/kg (the minimum effective dose that gives maximal protection) and six animals were untreated controls. In stage 1, treated animals received 4 weekly oral doses of ISL and were monitored for SIV infection for 7 weeks after the last dose. In stage 2, uninfected, treated animals from stage 1 were challenged similarly; 24 hours after challenge, 3 weekly oral doses of ISL 3.9 mg/kg were initiated. The treated animals were monitored for 7 weeks, as in stage 1. Uninfected, treated animals (from stage 2) entered stage 3. In stage 3, the animals were challenged as in stage 2; 24 hours after challenge, 2 weekly oral doses of ISL 3.9 mg/kg were initiated. The treated animals were monitored for 7 weeks, as before. Finally, in stage 4, uninfected, treated animals were challenged using IV administration and 24 hours later were treated with a single oral dose of ISL 3.9 mg/kg and monitored for 7 weeks. Infection was monitored through plasma viral RNA and proviral DNA amplification. Virus-specific antibody responses were measured using a commercial assay. ISL concentrations in plasma and ISL triphosphate (ISL-TP) levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were measured longitudinally.

Results: All untreated controls were viraemic 7 days after SIVmac251 IV challenge. All six ISL-treated animals were completely protected in stages 1-3 (Fisher exact test p = 0.0022). In stage 4, two of six ISL-treated animals became infected with wild-type SIVmac251: viraemia was observed at days 14 and 49 in the two animals (Fisher exact test p = 0.06). Both animals had unquantifiable ISL-TP on the day viraemia was observed.

Conclusions: Two weekly oral doses of ISL 3.9 mg/kg, administered 24 hours post IV SIV exposure, prevents infection of rhesus macaques. These results support further investigation of a long-acting oral NRTTI for PEP.

Keywords: SIV; islatravir; islatravir‐TP; pharmacokinetic; post‐exposure prophylaxis; rhesus macaque.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

KF, ND, DJH, JAG, MP, RV and TLD are current or former employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, and may own stock and/or options in Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. DJH is an inventor on related patents. MM, AG, LSB and BG have no conflicts to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Rhesus macaque SIVmac251 challenge model with PEP dosing at different stages. The black arrow shows the schedule of SIVmac251 inoculations at day −1. The blue arrows show the schedule of blood collection, and the green arrows show the schedule of weekly doses by oral gavage of ISL 3.9 mg/kg. Uninfected animals in stages 1–4 were then challenged as in stage 1 for each subsequent stage: receiving 3, 2 and 1 weekly dose of oral ISL, respectively, initiated 24 hours after inoculation and monitored for 7 weeks after the last dose. ISL, islatravir; PEP, post‐exposure prophylaxis; SIVmac251, simian immunodeficiency virus mac251.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Plasma viral load through day 49 in rhesus macaques for untreated control animals in stage 1 and treated animals in stages 1–3 after SIVmac251 IV inoculation, followed by 2−4 weekly doses of ISL 3.9 mg/kg by oral gavage. Undetectable viral loads are displayed at the LLD (40 copies/ml). The coloured lines represent individual animals. (b) Plasma viral load through day 49 in infected rhesus macaques in stage 4 after SIVmac251 IV inoculation followed by a single dose of ISL 3.9 mg/kg by oral gavage. The coloured lines represent individual animals. ISL, islatravir; IV, intravenous; LLD, lower limit of detection; SIVmac251, simian immunodeficiency virus mac251.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Mean weekly intracellular ISL‐TP concentration levels starting on day 7 in all four stages after 1−4 weekly oral doses of ISL 3.9 mg/kg. The arrows represent the timing of ISL dosing per stage. The figure includes data only if there were at least two measurements with quantifiable ISL‐TP at each specific time point for each stage. ISL‐TP was below the LLOQ in rhesus PBMCs from all animals 3 weeks after the last dose of ISL 3.9 mg/kg. (b) Comparison of rhesus ISL‐TP exposure to simulated exposure of ISL‐TP in humans after once‐daily oral dosing of ISL 0.25 mg, once‐weekly oral dosing of ISL 2 mg or a single dose of ISL 2 mg. Coloured lines and bands represent the simulated median and 95% prediction interval, respectively, for dosing in humans. The solid black line represents the observed mean concentrations with minimum and maximum concentrations represented in the error bars in stage 3 in macaques. ISL, islatravir; ISL‐TP, ISL‐triphosphate; IV, intravenous; LLOQ, lower limit of quantitation; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; QD, once daily; QW, once weekly.

Similar articles

References

    1. Hattori S, Ide K, Nakata H, Harada H, Suzu S, Ashida N, et al. Potent activity of a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, 4'‐ethynyl‐2‐fluoro‐2'‐deoxyadenosine, against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection in a model using human peripheral blood mononuclear cell‐transplanted NOD/SCID Janus kinase 3 knockout mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(9):3887–3893. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Massud I, Ruone S, Zlotorzynska M, Haaland R, Mills P, Cong ME, et al. Single oral dose for HIV pre or post‐exposure prophylaxis: user desirability and biological efficacy in macaques. EBioMedicine. 2020;. 58:102894. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bekerman E, Cox S, Babusis D, Campigotto F, Das M, Barouch DH, et al. Two‐dose emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide plus bictegravir prophylaxis protects macaques against SHIV infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021;76(3):692–698. - PMC - PubMed
    1. CDC . Updated guidelines for antiretroviral postexposure prophylaxis after sexual, injection drug use, or other nonoccupational exposure to HIV‐United States. Centers for Disease Control; 2016. - PubMed
    1. WHO . Guidelines for HIV post‐exposure prophylaxis. 2024. Accessed March 4, 2025. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240095137. - PubMed

Grants and funding