Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;15(6):e70535.
doi: 10.1002/brb3.70535.

Influences of Gait Training with Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis on Gait Ability and Independence in Severe Hemiplegia and Pusher Behavior with Unilateral Spatial Neglect Following Stroke: A Retrospective Historical Controlled Study

Affiliations

Influences of Gait Training with Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthosis on Gait Ability and Independence in Severe Hemiplegia and Pusher Behavior with Unilateral Spatial Neglect Following Stroke: A Retrospective Historical Controlled Study

Kota Sawa et al. Brain Behav. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Orthotic therapy is crucial for post-stroke patients with severe motor paralysis and higher brain dysfunction, including pushers and unilateral spatial neglect (USN). These patients exhibit impaired postural control and compromised independence in activities of daily living (ADLs), often necessitating mid- to long-term intervention using knee-ankle-foot orthoses (KAFOs). However, the influences of extended orthotic intervention in severe and pusher cases remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the influences of KAFO on walking ability and independence in severe hemiplegia with pusher and USN and pusher cases who wore KAFO and performed training routinely for more than 3 months.

Methods: This longitudinal, retrospective, and historical controlled study included 44 patients: 22 hemiplegics (hemiplegia group) and 22 pushers (pusher group). Demographic data were matched using a propensity score to adjust for heterogeneity, resulting in a 1:1 patient ratio. KAFOs in both groups were defined as those used within 1 week of the rehabilitation prescription date. This mean as motor paralysis was severe, patients who used KAFOs for at least 3 months in rehabilitation situations. Outcomes comprised the following: procedure A, comparing ambulation at admission and discharge (functional ambulation category [FAC]) and gait independence (FIM-gait) between groups;and procedure B, investigating factors affecting gait ability, and determinants of pusher behavior with USN presence, derived from demographics. In statistical analyses, procedure A employed two-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni post-hoc tests (p<0.05), whereas procedure B employed multiple regression analysis (Stepwise method) to examine gait independence within the two groups, and logistic regression analysis (Wald method) was used to examine factors that generate pusher behavior with USN.

Results: In using orthotic devices, a significant interaction between gait independence and FAC, along with a simple main effect of timing and group, indicated less improvement at discharge for the pusher group (p < 0.05). Onset days and SPV variability errors influenced severe hemiplegia cases, whereas SPV-EO variability errors impacted USN cases, with moderate regression coefficients (p < 0.05).

Discussion: Long-term KAFO intervention demonstrated improvement in severe hemiplegia and modest improvement in USN cases. The days since onset and SPV variability errors were crucial factors influencing gait independence in severe hemiplegia, whereas SPV-EO variability errors influenced a role in determining gait independence in patients with USN. This hindered gait independence in patients with pusher pain and USN, despite observed improvements in gait ability over time during the recovery process.

Keywords: gait abilities; independence; knee–ankle–foot orthosis; pusher; severe stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study design in historical control and study protocol. A comparative study by baseline parameters in Analysis 1, and a comparative study after rehabilitation by two‐way ANOVA and examination of factors affecting gait independence for severe and pusher cases.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Knee–ankle–foot orthosis in rehabilitation.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
A) Gait independence of FIM and (B) FAC. FIM, functional independence measure; FAC, functional ambulation category; P, pusher cases. aInteraction. bSimple main effect (p < 0.05).

Similar articles

References

    1. Abe, H. , Kadowaki K., Tsujimoto N., and Okanuka T.. 2021. “A Narrative Review of Alternate Gait Training Using Knee‐Ankle‐Foot Orthosis in Stroke Patients With Severe Hemiparesis.” Physical Therapy Research 24: 195–203. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abe, H. , Nishiyama K., Yamamoto Y., Okanuka T., Yonezawa Y., and Matsumoto K.. 2021. “Impact of Alternate Gait Training Using Knee‐Ankle‐Foot Orthoses With Oil Damper Ankle Hinge in Patients With Subacute Severe Hemiplegia.” Brain Sciences 11: 1430. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Babyar, S. R. , and Peterson M. G.. 2017. “Reding M: Case‐Control Study of Impairments Associated With Recovery From “Pusher Syndrome” After Stroke: Logistic Regression Analyses.” Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 26, no. 1: 25–33. - PubMed
    1. Baccini, M. , Paci M., Nannetti L., Biricolti C., and Rinaldi L. A.. 2008. “Scale for Contraversive Pushing: Cutoff Scores for Diagnosing “Pusher Behavior” and Construct Validity.” Physical Therapy 88, no. 8: 947–955. - PubMed
    1. Baniqued, P. D. E. , Stanyer E. C., Awais M., et al. 2021. “Brain–Computer Interface Robotics for Hand Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Systematic Review.” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 18: 15. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources