The quality and reliability of short videos about premature ovarian failure on Bilibili and TikTok: Cross-sectional study
- PMID: 40534890
- PMCID: PMC12174690
- DOI: 10.1177/20552076251351077
The quality and reliability of short videos about premature ovarian failure on Bilibili and TikTok: Cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background: Premature ovarian failure (POF) is a condition where ovarian function ceases before age 40, leading to infertility and other health issues. As public health awareness increases, platforms like TikTok and Bilibili have become key sources for health-related content. However, the absence of peer review and regulatory oversight on short-video platforms may result in the spread of inaccurate or incomplete health information. This study evaluates the quality of videos related to POF on these platforms.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted, analyzing 187 POF-related videos from TikTok and Bilibili. The modified DISCERN and Global Quality Score (GQS) assessment tools were used to evaluate video reliability and quality. Data on video characteristics, including engagement metrics and content, were also collected. Statistical analyses were performed to assess differences between platforms, video sources, and video quality.
Result: TikTok is more popular than Bilibili. Videos on both platforms related to POF had suboptimal quality, with TikTok's GQS median at 3 (2-3) and Bilibili's at 2 (1-3), showing a significant difference (p < 0.05). However, both had median modified DISCERN scores of 2 (1-3), with no significant difference (p > 0.05). On Bilibili, video duration was positively correlated with quality scores (p < 0.001), but no such correlation was found on TikTok. Symptoms of POF were the most common topic, with 29% of videos providing detailed explanations. Diagnosis and treatment were discussed in 16% and 7.4% of videos, respectively. Expert-uploaded videos demonstrated significantly higher quality than those from non-experts and personal users, with GQS and modified DISCERN scores of 3 (2-4) and 2 (1-3), respectively.
Conclusions: TikTok had higher engagement and better quality than Bilibili, but both platforms had inadequate video quality and reliability on POF. Expert videos were more reliable. These findings highlight the need for better regulation and monitoring of health content on short-video platforms.
Keywords: Bilibili; Global Quality Score; Premature ovarian failure; TikTok; information quality; modified DISCERN; reliability; short videos; social media.
© The Author(s) 2025.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Quality and Dissemination of Uterine Fibroid Health Information on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 1;9:e75120. doi: 10.2196/75120. JMIR Form Res. 2025. PMID: 40749219 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the Video Content Quality of TikTok and Bilibili as Health Information Sources for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Cross-Sectional Study.Int J Rheum Dis. 2025 Jun;28(6):e70341. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.70341. Int J Rheum Dis. 2025. PMID: 40551617
-
Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study.BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2245. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23475-9. BMC Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40604838 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the quality of osteonecrosis and avascular necrosis content on youtube: a multidimensional analysis using DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS tools.J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 22;20(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06116-0. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025. PMID: 40696472 Free PMC article.
-
Content quality and reliability of YouTube videos on oral appliance therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic analysis.Spec Care Dentist. 2024 Sep;44(5):1307-1316. doi: 10.1111/scd.12995. Epub 2024 Mar 22. Spec Care Dentist. 2024. PMID: 38520058
References
-
- Ghahremani-Nasab M, Ghanbari E, Jahanbani Y, et al. Premature ovarian failure and tissue engineering. J Cell Physiol 2020; 235: 4217–4226. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials