Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;30(6):065001.
doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.30.6.065001. Epub 2025 Jun 18.

Structured light imaging mesoscopy: detection of embedded morphological changes in superficial tissues

Affiliations

Structured light imaging mesoscopy: detection of embedded morphological changes in superficial tissues

Mahsa Parsanasab et al. J Biomed Opt. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Significance: Current paradigms for the optical characterization of layered tissues involve explicit consideration of an inverse problem which is often ill-posed and whose resolution may retain significant uncertainty. Here, we present an alternative approach, structured light imaging mesoscopy (SLIM), that leverages the inherent sensitivity of raw spatial frequency domain (SFD) reflectance measurements for the detection of embedded subsurface scattering changes in tissue.

Aim: We identify wavelength-spatial frequency ( λ - f x ) combinations that provide optimal sensitivity of SFD reflectance changes originating from scattering changes in an embedded tissue layer. We specifically consider the effects of scattering changes in the superficial dermis which is a key locus of pathology for diverse skin conditions such as cancer, aging, and scleroderma.

Approach: We used Monte Carlo simulations in a four-layer skin model to analyze the SFD reflectance changes resulting from changes in superficial dermal scattering across wavelength ( λ = 471 to 851 nm) and spatial frequency ( f x = 0 to 0.5/mm). Within this model, we consider different values for epidermal melanin concentration to simulate variations in skin tone.

Results: Monte Carlo simulations revealed that scattering changes within the superficial dermis produce SFD reflectance changes which are maximized at specific ( λ - f x ) pairs and vary with skin tone. For light skin tones, SFD reflectance changes due to scattering reductions in the superficial dermis are maximized at λ = 621 nm and spatial frequency f x 0.33 / mm . By contrast, for darker skin tones, maximal SFD reflectance changes occur at wavelengths in the near-infrared ( λ 811 nm ) at a spatial frequency of f x 0.25 / mm . Interestingly, the change in SFD reflectance produced by such scattering changes is most uniform across all skin tones when using the longest wavelength tested ( λ = 851 nm ) and a spatial frequency of f x 0.22 / mm . Taken together, our computational model identifies specific ( λ - f x ) pairs to optimally detect embedded structural alterations in the superficial dermis.

Conclusions: The findings establish the SLIM methodology as a means to detect morphological changes in an embedded subsurface tissue layer by leveraging inherent sensitivities of spatial frequency domain reflectance. This approach promises to enable simplified clinical tracking of subsurface microstructural alterations without the explicit need to consider an inverse problem approach.

Keywords: Monte Carlo simulation; inverse problems; perturbation methods; spatial frequency domain measurement; subsurface morphological change detection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Diagram of the simplified four-layer skin tissue model (adapted from Ref. 43).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
SFD reflectance versus wavelength for baseline (solid black lines) and negative scattering perturbation (dashed red lines) at fx=0/mm (*) and fx=  0.2/mm () with 2% epidermal melanin concentration.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
SFD reflectance change ΔRd versus spatial frequency fx at individual wavelengths for epidermal melanin concentrations of (a) 2%, (b) 5%, and (c) 10%. Contour plots showing the variation of SFD reflectance, ΔRd, with fx and λ for epidermal melanin concentrations of (d) 2%, (e) 5%, and (f) 10%.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Wavelength dependence of (a) maximum reflectance changes, max ΔR, and (b) corresponding spatial frequency, fx at max ΔR for 2%, 5%, and 10% epidermal melanin concentrations.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
(a) Dimensionless “optimal” spatial frequency fx* versus (μs/μa). (b) Spectral dependence of the optimum spatial frequency fx,opt.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Plots of pzmax(z) for (a) and (b) λ=526  nm and (c) and (d) λ=851  nm before and after a 50% reduction in scattering within the papillary dermis, respectively, at fx=0,0.2, and 0.5/mm. Bar plots providing sampling depth statistics at (e) and (f) λ=526  nm and (g) and (h) λ=851  nm before and after scattering a 50% reduction in scattering within the papillary dermis, respectively. The median depth (d50) is represented by a circled dot, intervals of 25 to 75% (d25 to d75) by a rectangle, and 10 to 90% (d10 to d90) by a capped line at the same spatial frequencies as the Pzmax distributions. The shading of the plots is color-coded as follows: blue for the epidermis, green for the papillary dermis, yellow for the reticular dermis, and red for the subcutaneous tissue. All plots are for 2% epidermal melanin concentration. Results for 5% and 10% melanin concentrations are shown in Figs. S1 and S2 in the Supplementary Material, respectively.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Maximum penetration depth distribution difference before and after scattering perturbation at different spatial frequencies for (a) 526 nm and (b) 851 nm at 2% melanin concentration. Plots are color-coded as follows: blue for the epidermis, green for the papillary dermis, and yellow for the reticular dermis. Results for 5% and 10% melanin concentrations are shown in Figs. S3 and S4 in the Supplementary Material, respectively.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Individual layer contributions to the total reflectance change at spatial frequencies: fx=0, 0.2, and 0.5/mm for λ=526  nm with (a) 2% and (b) 10% melanin concentration and λ=851  nm with (c) 2% and (d) 10% melanin concentration. Due to negligible contribution, the epidermis was excluded from the plots. The subcutaneous tissue layer’s contribution is also negligible at shorter wavelengths (λ=526  nm) due to limited light penetration. Results for 5% melanin concentration are shown in Fig. S5 in the Supplementary Material.

Similar articles

  • Exploring the bias: how skin color influences oxygen saturation readings via Monte Carlo simulations.
    Narayana Swamy SK, Liu C, Correia R, Hayes-Gill BR, Morgan SP. Narayana Swamy SK, et al. J Biomed Opt. 2024 Jun;29(Suppl 3):S33308. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.29.S3.S33308. Epub 2024 Aug 29. J Biomed Opt. 2024. PMID: 39211937 Free PMC article.
  • Short-Term Memory Impairment.
    Cascella M, Al Khalili Y. Cascella M, et al. 2024 Jun 8. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2024 Jun 8. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 31424720 Free Books & Documents.
  • Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome.
    Baddam S, Burns B. Baddam S, et al. 2025 Jun 20. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2025 Jun 20. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 31613449 Free Books & Documents.
  • Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.
    Struyf T, Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, Takwoingi Y, Davenport C, Leeflang MM, Spijker R, Hooft L, Emperador D, Domen J, Tans A, Janssens S, Wickramasinghe D, Lannoy V, Horn SRA, Van den Bruel A; Cochrane COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group. Struyf T, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35593186 Free PMC article.
  • The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
    Davenport C, Arevalo-Rodriguez I, Mateos-Haro M, Berhane S, Dinnes J, Spijker R, Buitrago-Garcia D, Ciapponi A, Takwoingi Y, Deeks JJ, Emperador D, Leeflang MMG, Van den Bruel A; Cochrane COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group. Davenport C, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39679851 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Mehendale A. M., et al. , “Structured light imaging mesoscopy: application to skin changes in scleroderma,” Biophotonics Discov. 2(2), 025002 (2025). 10.1117/1.BIOS.2.2.025002 - DOI
    1. Farrell T. J., Patterson M. S., Wilson B., “A diffusion theory model of spatially resolved, steady‐state diffuse reflectance for the noninvasive determination of tissue optical properties in vivo,” Med. Phys. 19(4), 879–888 (1992). 10.1118/1.596777 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yamada Y., “Light-tissue interaction and optical imaging in biomedicine,” Annu. Rev. Heat Transf. 6, 1–59 (1995). 10.1615/AnnualRevHeatTransfer.v6.30 - DOI
    1. Farrell T. J., Patterson M. S., Essenpreis M., “Influence of layered tissue architecture on estimates of tissue optical properties obtained from spatially resolved diffuse reflectometry,” Appl. Opt. 37(10), 1958–1972 (1998). 10.1364/AO.37.001958 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zonios G., Bykowski J., Kollias N., “Skin melanin, hemoglobin, and light scattering properties can be quantitatively assessed in vivo using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy,” J. Invest. Dermatol. 117(6), 1452–1457 (2001). 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01577.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types