Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 4:16:1562351.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1562351. eCollection 2025.

The action-sentence compatibility effect in third person action sentence comprehension

Affiliations

The action-sentence compatibility effect in third person action sentence comprehension

Zhiwei Cai et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of object animacy and perspective priming on the Action-sentence Compatibility Effect (ACE) in third-person action sentences using the sentence sensibility judgment paradigm. Experiment 1 showed that ACE occurred along the front-back axis when the object was an inanimate noun. Experiment 2 revealed that ACE appeared along the left-right axis when the object was a personal name. Experiment 3 demonstrated that ACE aligned with the action's direction under agent priming, while ACE shifted to the opposite direction under patient priming. These findings suggest that participants can flexibly simulate the perspective of an action based on spatial when processing third-person action sentences.

Keywords: ACE; action-sentence comprehension; indexical hypothesis; perceptual symbol systems; third person.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Front-back axis condition. (B) Left-right axis condition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Perspective-taking materials used in Erle and Topolinski (2017). Reproduced with permission from the study of Erle and Topolinski (2017).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Experimental setup in experiment 3.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Procedure of experiment 3.

Similar articles

References

    1. Barsalou L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behav. Brain Sci. 22, 577–660. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99002149, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bergen B., Chang N. (2005). Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding. Constr. Grammars Cognitive Grounding Theor. Ext. 3, 147–190. doi: 10.1075/cal.3.08ber - DOI
    1. Bergen B. K., Wheeler K. B. (2005). “Sentence understanding engages motor processes,” in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
    1. Beveridge M. E. L., Pickering M. J. (2013). Perspective taking in language: integrating the spatial and action domains. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:577. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00577, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bidet-Ildei C., Beauprez S. A., Badets A. (2020). A review of literature on the link between action observation and action language: advancing a shared semantic theory. New Ideas Psychol. 58:100777. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2019.100777 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources