Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 18;15(2):99952.
doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i2.99952.

Donor-specific antibodies against HLA-C, HLA-DP and HLA-DQ and their implications in kidney transplantation

Affiliations
Review

Donor-specific antibodies against HLA-C, HLA-DP and HLA-DQ and their implications in kidney transplantation

Muhammad Abdul Mabood Khalil et al. World J Transplant. .

Abstract

HLA-C, HLA-DP and HLA-DQ are thought to be benign due to low expression and few initial negative studies. Historically, most allocation programs used HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-DR antigens for matching. With the advent and use of single-bead antigen assays, more was learned about donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) against these antigens. Interest in these antigens and antibodies grew when cases of acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), mixed rejections, chronic AMR, and reduced graft survival were reported with DSAs against these antigens. Although the deleterious effects of these DSAs are more pronounced in retransplants, harmful effects have also been observed in first-time recipients. DSAs against each of these antigens can trigger rejection alone. Their combination with DSAs against HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-DR can cause more damage. It has been shown that strategies that reduce mismatches for these antigen lead to fewer rejections and better graft survival. There is a need for greater consensus on the universal typing of these antigens prior to transplantation for better patient and graft outcomes. This review focuses on the interaction of these antigens with lymphocytes and killer immunoglobulin receptors, arguments for not typing them, detailed analyses of the literature about their harmful effects, potential strategies moving forward, and recommendations for the future.

Keywords: Donor specific antibodies; HLA-C; HLA-DP; HLA-DQ; Kidney transplantation; Review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.

Similar articles

References

    1. Shiina T, Hosomichi K, Inoko H, Kulski JK. The HLA genomic loci map: expression, interaction, diversity and disease. J Hum Genet. 2009;54:15–39. - PubMed
    1. Klein J, Sato A. The HLA system. First of two parts. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:702–709. - PubMed
    1. Klein J, Sato A. The HLA system. Second of two parts. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:782–786. - PubMed
    1. Choo SY. The HLA system: genetics, immunology, clinical testing, and clinical implications. Yonsei Med J. 2007;48:11–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ling M, Marfo K, Masiakos P, Aljanabi A, Lindower J, Glicklich D, de Boccardo G, Greenstein S, Chapochnick-Friedmann J, Kayler L, Kinkhabwala M, Akalin E. Pretransplant anti-HLA-Cw and anti-HLA-DP antibodies in sensitized patients. Hum Immunol. 2012;73:879–883. - PubMed