Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun;5(2):149-161.
doi: 10.1097/CD9.0000000000000155. Epub 2025 Apr 10.

Challenges and Opportunities for Atrial Fibrillation Management

Affiliations
Review

Challenges and Opportunities for Atrial Fibrillation Management

Minsi Cai et al. Cardiol Discov. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia worldwide and is associated with poor clinical outcomes and a huge economic burden on healthcare systems. Optimized anticoagulation, better symptom control via rhythm or rate control, and comprehensive comorbidity/risk factor management are 3 essential pillars of current AF management, where much progress has been made during the past decades. However, numerous challenges in AF management remain at the disease, patient, and population levels, including an incomplete understanding of basic mechanisms that can be clinically targeted; heterogenous progressive natural history; poor correlation between rhythm and symptoms/outcomes; as well as suboptimal detection methods and treatment options. Recent advances in disease perception in combination with modern monitoring devices, state-of-the art computational models, and novel antiarrhythmic drugs and ablation strategies can contribute to addressing these issues, ultimately leading to a paradigm shift in AF diagnosis, classification, and treatment. This narrative review summarizes these key challenges and future opportunities in the field of AF management.

Keywords: Anticoagulation; Atrial fibrillation; Pathophysiology; Precision medicine; Rhythm control; Translational challenges.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Interactive disease-level, patient-level, and population-level challenges in current AF management. Black boxes represent current challenges, and red boxes represent clinical observations. Black and red solid arrows represent the relationship between challenges and corresponding clinical observations. Dotted red lines represent the interaction between different clinical observations. AADs: Antiarrhythmic drugs; AF: Atrial fibrillation; CA: Catheter ablation; ECV: Electrical cardioversion; OAC: Oral anticoagulation; SCAF: Subclinical AF.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Conceptual model describing the association among risk factors for ACM, AF, and stroke. In this model, ACM-promoting factors can produce the abnormal atrial substrates and cause ACM. Meanwhile, ACM is associated with higher risks of stroke and AF. Once AF occurs and continues for a period, the AF-induced electrical remodeling, atrial enlargement, and fibrosis can further stimulate the accumulation of atrial substrates, which increases the susceptibility to stroke and sustained AF. Except for ACM-caused stroke without the presence of AF, stroke may also be the result of extra stroke-promoting risk factors outside of the atrium and typical AF-induced hypercoagulability. Reversely, it is unclear if the post-stroke inflammation and altered activity of the autonomous nerve system may promote AF occurrence (dotted blue line). Finally, AF may also be the consequence of other AF-promoting risk factors. These ACM/stroke/AF-promoting risk factors may share common cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities. ACM: Atrial cardiomyopathy; AF: Atrial fibrillation.

Similar articles

References

    1. Hindricks G Potpara T Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2021;42(5):373–498. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612. - PubMed
    1. Data from: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). GBD Results. Seattle, WA: IHME, University of Washington, 2020. Available from https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/(link is external). Accessed April 5, 2024.
    1. Guo Y Tian Y Wang H, et al. Prevalence, incidence, and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation in China: new insights into the global burden of atrial fibrillation. Chest 2015;147(1):109–119. doi:10.1378/chest.14-0321. - PubMed
    1. Magnussen C Niiranen TJ Ojeda FM, et al. Sex Differences and Similarities in Atrial Fibrillation Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Mortality in Community Cohorts: Results From the BiomarCaRE Consortium (Biomarker for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Europe). Circulation 2017;136(17):1588–1597. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028981. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Joglar JA Chung MK Armbruster AL, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2024;149(1):e1–e156. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources